Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: 5.0.9 broke sorting by From: in web client?

  1. #1
    dNb
    dNb is offline Active Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    38
    Rep Power
    8

    Default 5.0.9 broke sorting by From: in web client?

    This is one of those bizarro situations that leads me to wonder if it is just our install that is somehow broken. After an upgrade to 5.0.9 NE, our users have found they can't click on the "From" column header in the web interface to sort their messages by the sender. Other headers are clickable (Date, Subject, etc), but From remains recalcitrant. This functionality is kind of important to our users.

    I've tested this from both Safari 3 and Firefox 3 (with clean caches), both behave exactly the same. Is this a real bug I should file?

    -- dNb

  2. #2
    dNb
    dNb is offline Active Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    38
    Rep Power
    8

    Default

    Given the second report of this here, I've filed bug #31102: Sorting by sender in web client broken in 5.0.9.

    -- dNb

  3. #3
    gnyce is offline Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    outside Philadelphia
    Posts
    214
    Rep Power
    8

    Default

    I also filed a bug on this, this morning:
    Bug 31080 – 5.0.9 upgrade broke sorting on From column in Inbox

    Also - [Bug 31081] upgrade to 5.0.9 broke some keystrokes in AJAX client
    Bug 31081 – upgrade to 5.0.9 broke some keystrokes in AJAX client

  4. #4
    dNb
    dNb is offline Active Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    38
    Rep Power
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gnyce View Post
    Cool. Your bug is now the canonical one (mine got closed as a duplicate).

    -- dNb
    Last edited by dNb; 08-26-2008 at 04:46 AM. Reason: (fixed typo)

  5. #5
    Rich Graves is offline Outstanding Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    718
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Thanks for posting. I think our 5.0.9 upgrade is off. Any compelling positive changes in 5.0.9?

    These are the only issues that look relevant to us. Better Palm and iPhone support would be nice but isn't critical.

    Bug 28598 – appointment reminder showing wrong alert at wrong time
    Bug 30538 – VersaMail 3.5.4 does not sync mails
    Bug 29899 – iPhone 2.0 + Zimbra Mobile Sync can cause high CPU usage for large mailboxes

  6. #6
    gnyce is offline Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    outside Philadelphia
    Posts
    214
    Rep Power
    8

    Default

    Nothing compelling, or fixed-problems that we were experiencing, no. The iphone support was supposed to be more solid (e.g. there was a battery-life bug, but seemed to be more of a corner case) - the main reason I went to 5.0.9... too quickly it seems. Small benefit, initial registration of mobile-sync for an iphone works the first time now (used to take two times for it to be successfull).

  7. #7
    dNb
    dNb is offline Active Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    38
    Rep Power
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rich Graves View Post
    Thanks for posting. I think our 5.0.9 upgrade is off. Any compelling positive changes in 5.0.9?
    We upgraded quickly to get the iPhone fixes (fix for drain w/cal & contact sync, no cpu load spike, sync multiple (but alas, not shared) calendars).

    The only negative so far that our users have noticed is the lack of sender sort I mentioned.

    -- dNb
    Last edited by dNb; 08-26-2008 at 04:48 AM.

  8. #8
    Rich Graves is offline Outstanding Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    718
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    As suggested at Bug 30538 – VersaMail 3.5.4 does not sync mails there exists a way to backport the mobile sync features of 5.0.9 to 5.0.8. Obviously Zimbra doesn't want to be in the business of backporting, but they happened to have produced it already for another customer before 5.0.9 was released. If you are in the same sort of start-of-school-year situation as we are, you can ask support nicely for the existing zimbrasync.jar hot patch to apply to 5.0.8.

  9. #9
    jlevis is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    5
    Rep Power
    6

    Default

    I'm not sure when our system will be upgraded to 5.10, so does anyone know a functional solution for this in the meantime?

  10. #10
    tgx's Avatar
    tgx
    tgx is offline Elite Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    300
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jlevis View Post
    I'm not sure when our system will be upgraded to 5.10, so does anyone know a functional solution for this in the meantime?
    5.0.9 is lame IMHO. I'd not upgrafe if you don't have to.
    Too many new bugs. See also Bug 31292. It's nasty if
    your userbase makes heavy use of IM,

    I'm hoping 5.0.10 is much better.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-24-2008, 07:14 PM
  2. can't you help me
    By iwan siahaan in forum Administrators
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-17-2007, 06:53 PM
  3. Web Client Performance and Basic client features
    By fviero in forum Administrators
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-23-2007, 05:34 AM
  4. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-29-2007, 11:41 PM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-05-2007, 11:49 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •