Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sam Hunter I'd like to note that M3 seems to be a LOT smoother than M2. After testing with large message deletions and various other things that caused problems in M2, I've yet to see anything unexpected from M3. Performance also seems to be better and consistent.
thanks Zimbra team!
Sam |
Okay, okay, where is this "M3" so that I too, may have a modern working system?
Finally actually bothered trying this out, and the performance is abysmal, and the lack
of client-feedback is scary. Hung send window/with attachment coupled with
"done" status is giving contrary info, it's confusing.
But, this software is really really so very promising, i'm quite excited by it.
Considering what it does, I'm not upset or anything. But I should very much like to see it work.
PS,
Server (dedicated, nothing else running)
dual 700mhz xeon, 1 gig registered, small scsi raid-0 array. centos 4.2 fully
patched. Just to try it out.
Clients,
Mozilla 1.7.12- Apple Powerbook G4 (second gen),
Firefox 1.5, Linux x86, moble athlonxp 2600,