Zimbra offers Open Source email server software and shared calendar for Linux and the Mac
Go Back   Zimbra :: Forums > Other > /etc

Welcome to the Zimbra :: Forums!
Welcome, if you would like to post a comment please register. We also encourage you to explore all things Zimbra with our team and members of the community.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-28-2009, 08:42 AM
Moderator
 
Posts: 7,911
Default Zimbra & SSDs

I am going to build a new home server shortly and quite interested in the idea of using a SSD to host the OS and Zimbra. Obviously I would not want a huge number of writes to take place on the SSD so what directories would need to be mounted on a standard HD ? This is how my current server looks
Code:
[root@office log]# df
Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00
                      38533760   8498848  28045896  24% /
/dev/xvda1              101086     27755     68112  29% /boot
tmpfs                  1572952         0   1572952   0% /dev/shm
/dev/shm                102400        40    102360   1% /opt/zimbra/data/amavisd/tmp
Would it really make much difference ? I guess it would depend on how often files from the SSD would be read or does Jetty hold most of them in cache anyway ?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-28-2009, 09:13 AM
y@w y@w is offline
Moderator
 
Posts: 658
Default

Not sure what filesystem / configuration you're using but I'd say that for sure you'd want to turn atime off if you're using ext3.. Zimbra recommends it in the large deployment wiki page (which I'm guessing your home server wouldn't qualify for ) but it updates the disk each time a file is acccessed if not turned off.

http://wiki.zimbra.com/index.php?tit...ts#File_System


I found another person saying not using noatime (good old double negative going on) on SSD is "harmful". Bad for performance or hard on disks, I'm not sure..

SSD Without noatime Mount Option Considered Harmful - HUGE Performance Boost Kevin Burton’s NEW FeedBlog
__________________
What a n00b!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2009, 11:09 AM
Outstanding Member
 
Posts: 684
Default Permissions.

If the SSD's are looked at as removeable drives, permissions may be a possible issue. I have had issues with USB drives.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-02-2009, 02:09 AM
Moderator
 
Posts: 7,911
Default

They use a standard IDE/SATA interface so will act as a normal drive.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-02-2009, 08:56 AM
Outstanding Member
 
Posts: 684
Default Now big...

How big of an SSD can you get these days?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-02-2009, 08:58 AM
Moderator
 
Posts: 7,911
Default

128GB yet I only have 40GB allocated to my VM partition and could get it all into a 32GB one
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2009, 07:14 AM
Outstanding Member
 
Posts: 684
Default Found this today.

Didn't read the article but remembered you posting this thread sometime back. Did you ever decide to go SSD?

Considering an SSD? Read this | The Apple Core | ZDNet.com
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2009, 07:26 AM
Moderator
 
Posts: 7,911
Default

Unfortunately for the gains it becomes a little cost prohibitive (especially a home office server ) Funds allowing I shall be moving to a iSCSI setup though instead
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads

Why Join?

Registering let's you ask questions, makes it easier to search, displays any files attached to posts, and notifies you about replies.

blog.zimbra.com




 

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.