Zimbra offers Open Source email server software and shared calendar for Linux and the Mac
Go Back   Zimbra :: Forums > Other > /etc

Welcome to the Zimbra :: Forums!
Welcome, if you would like to post a comment please register. We also encourage you to explore all things Zimbra with our team and members of the community.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 05:46 AM
Moderator
 
Posts: 7,911
Default NAS/iSCSI

Just thought I would ask for peoples different experiences of these technologies in combination with ZCS. I am looking to build a filter for my home network and would like to serve LUNs to all my VMs using it. I believe that it would be best to use iSCSI with a giga-network, and then use Open Filer as the appliance software.

What are your thoughts ? I know a couple of other mods are using this software so I would be very grateful for their feedback aswell.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 05:54 AM
Moderator
 
Posts: 1,531
Default

We are in the process of deploying zimbra using vmware esx server wtih a lefthand iscsi san as the storage. so far so good but we only have a dozen users on it so far. I'll wait until we have a few hundred and it's working well before declaring it a good move
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 07:13 AM
Moderator
 
Posts: 451
Default

I saw your post over on OpenFiler.com's forums...I was kind of wondering the same thing. I have been toying around with openfiler for HSM and for backups.
__________________
http://perceiva.com
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 07:24 AM
Moderator
 
Posts: 7,911
Default

really considering one of these :- Chenbro Micom Co., Ltd.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 07:25 AM
Outstanding Member
 
Posts: 684
Default

OK, so now I'm jealous. I looked at the storage solution you mentioned. I need it. :-)

If you have a separate box with your scsi solution installed. Would you mount this solution in the /opt directory and the install ZCS? I need to do a little more reading obviously.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 07:29 AM
Moderator
 
Posts: 451
Default

I was kinda thinking something like this (in black of course): Supermicro, Inc. - Products | SuperServers | 3U | 6035B-8R+V / 6035B-8R+B
__________________
http://perceiva.com
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 07:32 AM
Moderator
 
Posts: 7,911
Default

Personally, I would present a LUN to the ZCS server and use this storage for the mailstore. I would leave the ZCS installation on the local disks to avoid additional loading time latency.

The SuperMicro box looks nice - loads of disks
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 07:37 AM
Moderator
 
Posts: 451
Default

Anyone running their mailstore on iSCSI? Or are folks just using it for backups and such?
__________________
http://perceiva.com
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 07:42 AM
Moderator
 
Posts: 7,911
Default

I'm interested in that aswell. I would imagine that if you are using a dedicated giga-switch for the filer and have a separate NIC in the ZCS for the storage all should be okay. Just remember to keep the length of CAT6e cables as short as possible.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 09:36 AM
Moderator
 
Posts: 2,207
Default

AFAIR, I read in the forum a zimbroïd telling to avoid iSCSI for the main storage because of "iSCSI not being able to handle enough IOPS".
However, I can not find this post again...

But it was a couple of years ago, with the "new" iSCSI hardware/software, I too wonder if iSCSI is still to be avoided.

Last edited by Klug; 05-14-2008 at 09:39 AM..
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Why Join?

Registering let's you ask questions, makes it easier to search, displays any files attached to posts, and notifies you about replies.

blog.zimbra.com




 

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.