Zimbra offers Open Source email server software and shared calendar for Linux and the Mac
Go Back   Zimbra :: Forums > Zimbra Collaboration Suite > Administrators

Welcome to the Zimbra :: Forums!
Welcome, if you would like to post a comment please register. We also encourage you to explore all things Zimbra with our team and members of the community.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2006, 02:25 PM
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 177
Default RAID 5 recommendation

When I was reading the multiple server install document in the section where it was giving system requirements I saw a note that said:

Quote:
On systems with more than 100 accounts RAID 5 is not recommended.
Why is that a recommendation?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2006, 06:54 PM
Loyal Member
 
Posts: 76
Default

Disk writes are slower with RAID 5 as a result of all the parity checking.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2009, 08:00 AM
ECB ECB is offline
Active Member
 
Posts: 39
Default

In that case, what is the recommended RAID or disk setup for a server hosting more than 100 users?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2009, 08:16 AM
Zimbra Consultant & Moderator
 
Posts: 19,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ECB View Post
In that case, what is the recommended RAID or disk setup for a server hosting more than 100 users?
You should use RAID10.
__________________
Regards


Bill
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2009, 08:43 AM
Trained Alumni
 
Posts: 342
Default

Here we do our STORE, INDEX, and DB on RAID10. BACKUP and HSM are on RAID5.

Matt
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2009, 08:45 AM
Moderator
 
Posts: 7,911
Default

Performance Tuning Guidelines for Large Deployments - Zimbra :: Wiki
Ajcody notes on disk subsystems
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2009, 11:16 AM
Special Member
 
Posts: 100
Question Questions

Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenix View Post
You should use RAID10.
What is your opinion of RAID50 and a decent controller w/ battery backed write cache?

Also what is your option regarding filesystems? I have seen much better zimbra performance on reiserfs than ext3 with no problems.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2009, 01:32 PM
Moderator
 
Posts: 7,911
Default

reiser I would not use IMHO ... stay mainstream on ext3 and optimize. So many factors are involved we would need to understand your full requirement first.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2009, 01:46 PM
Special Member
 
Posts: 100
Thumbs down

Quote:
Originally Posted by uxbod View Post
reiser I would not use IMHO ... stay mainstream on ext3 and optimize. So many factors are involved we would need to understand your full requirement first.
<rant>
I think that is a silly reaction. riserfs3 has been mainstream for a very long time. We use riserfs3 for all of our servers and have for many years, it has been far more solid than ext3 with better performance. People who had riserfs3 problems are thinking back to the early releases with the 2.4 kernel.

If you have technical reasons, then by all means explain. But what you said sounds like the typical anti-riserfs3 FUD.
<rant />
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2009, 02:15 PM
Moderator
 
Posts: 1,531
Default

people are rightfully skeptical about the future of reiser given the creator is locked up and the company mainly behind it's development disappeared. however, it's still being actively developed afaik.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads

Why Join?

Registering let's you ask questions, makes it easier to search, displays any files attached to posts, and notifies you about replies.

blog.zimbra.com




 

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.