Hello volunteers,
I'm trying to understand why an email never arrived at our zcs server. We have an external email provider who receives all mail for our domain and forwards them to our internal zimra mail server.
In their logs (merak mail server), they have the following at the time the message was sent (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is the sender's mta, yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy is the public ip of our zimbra server):
Code:
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx [0A80] 11:33:06 <<< MAIL FROM:<sender@senderdomain.com> SIZE=608505
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx [0A80] 11:33:06 >>> 250 2.1.0 <sender@senderdomain.com>... Sender ok
yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy [0A80] 11:33:07 Client session >>> MAIL From:<sender@senderdomain.com>
yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy [0A80] 11:33:07 Client session >>> MAIL From:<sender@senderdomain.com>
yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy [0A80] 11:33:07 Client session >>> MAIL From:<sender@senderdomain.com>
SYSTEM [0DB4] 11:33:08 Client session *** <sender@senderdomain.com> <recipient1@ourdomain.com> 1 608690
00:00:00 INCOMPLETE-SESSION HVF45507
SYSTEM [0298] 11:33:08 Client session *** <sender@senderdomain.com> <recipient2@ourdomain.com> 1 608690
00:00:00 INCOMPLETE-SESSION HVF45507
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx [0A80] 11:33:08 *** <sender@senderdomain.com> <recipient1@ourdomain.com> 3 608505 00:00:00 OK HVF45507
SYSTEM [0B78] 11:33:08 Client session *** <sender@senderdomain.com> <recipient3@ourdomain.com> 1 608690
00:00:00 INCOMPLETE-SESSION HVF45507
So I checked our logs at /var/log/zimbra.log. The only suspicious entry that was written roughly at the same time is the following:
Code:
Nov 24 11:34:28 mail postfix/anvil[3247]: statistics: max connection rate 5/60s for (smtp:zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz) at Nov 24 11:30:19
Nov 24 11:34:28 mail postfix/anvil[3247]: statistics: max connection count 2 for (smtp:zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz at Nov 24 11:29:45
Nov 24 11:34:28 mail postfix/anvil[3247]: statistics: max cache size 2 at Nov 24 11:25:11
(zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz is the public ip of our email provider's merak server)
My question is 1. are postfox/anvil's log entries errors or just normal statistics? And 2. any ideas on why the session would fail?
Cheers,
Fabrice