Zimbra offers Open Source email server software and shared calendar for Linux and the Mac
Go Back   Zimbra :: Forums > Zimbra Collaboration Suite > Administrators

Welcome to the Zimbra :: Forums!
Welcome, if you would like to post a comment please register. We also encourage you to explore all things Zimbra with our team and members of the community.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-07-2010, 08:25 AM
Senior Member
 
Posts: 60
Default Adding second NIC interface for DNS - How will this affect Zimbra?

I am adding a second interface to my Zimbra server to act as a new Primary DNS Server. I thought I read somewhere that Zimbra will automagically listen to all interfaces. What grief might this cause me?

Can this create an asymmetric route? Traffic comes in one interface, and gets sent out the other? Or can this all be controlled with routing?

Just looking for anyone who has been through the gotchyas with this ...
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-07-2010, 05:38 PM
Senior Member
 
Posts: 60
Default

One way is to try it...

I added the IP alias (sub-interface) eth0:0 and enabled it.
Within seconds, I was seeing error messages like these:

Dec 7 15:38:49 mymail postfix/smtp[13912]: 14CB1CD00109: host f.mx.mail.yahoo.com[98.137.54.237] refused to talk to me: 421 4.7.0 [GL01] Message from (www.xxx.yyy.zzz) temporarily deferred - 4.16.50. Please refer to 421 Message from (x.x.x.x) temporarily deferred - 4.16.50 | Yahoo! Postmaster Help

The real ip address is the new sub-interface eth0:0 just added.
Zimbra should not be sending anything out from there.

yahoo, aol, and several others were blocking email messages due to improper whitelisting, or poor ip reputation, or some other such nonsense.

Can anyone tell me how to tell Zimbra to only use the IP address on the interface that matches the appropriate MX record and reverse PTR lookup?

Surely there must be a way to run a multihomed Zimbra server.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-07-2010, 06:15 PM
Senior Member
 
Posts: 60
Default

Or is this a known bug?

Bug 6111 – allow user to specify interface to bind to, instead of taking them all.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-07-2010, 08:22 PM
y@w y@w is offline
Moderator
 
Posts: 658
Default

IIRC, Zimbra will bind to all of the IP addresses on your box after the first start of Zimbra after adding said IP address. However, it will only route traffic out the default gateway for traffic that's outside of the second interface's subnet unless you've got some really fancy routing happening.
__________________
What a n00b!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12-08-2010, 12:11 AM
Senior Member
 
Posts: 60
Default

Outbound email connections are being made from the wrong IP address.
It does not match the MX record for the FQDN. I doubt if routing is the issue.

I had to shutdown the sub-interface to get Zimbra to behave properly again.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-08-2010, 10:08 AM
Senior Member
 
Posts: 60
Default

OK, I'm giving up on the second interface idea.

I am going to simplify my life, and just enable DNS on the existing interface.
One IP, no routing issues, no conflicts that I know of.

Thoughts anyone?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads

Why Join?

Registering let's you ask questions, makes it easier to search, displays any files attached to posts, and notifies you about replies.

blog.zimbra.com




 

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.