@uxbod:
Here are the results:
Quote:
cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost
# Auto-generated hostname. Please do not remove this comment.
66.77.88.99 h1234567.server.net h1234567
cat /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 11.12.13.14
nameserver 15.16.17.18
dig domain1.com mx
; <<>> DiG 9.4.2-P2 <<>> domain1.com mx
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 7048
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;domain1.com. IN MX
;; ANSWER SECTION:
domain1.com. 1800 IN MX 10 domain1.com.
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
domain1.com. 1800 IN A 66.77.88.99
;; Query time: 40 msec
;; SERVER: *.*.*.7#53(*.*.*.7)
;; WHEN: Tue Nov 23 11:54:48 2010
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 61
dig domain1.com any
; <<>> DiG 9.4.2-P2 <<>> domain1.com any
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 50723
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 5, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 3
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;domain1.com. IN ANY
;; ANSWER SECTION:
domain1.com. 1800 IN NS ns2.server.net.
domain1.com. 1800 IN MX 10 domain1.com.
domain1.com. 1800 IN SOA ns.server.net. hostmaster.server.net. 2010111501 10000 14400 604800 1800
domain1.com. 1800 IN NS ns.server.net.
domain1.com. 1800 IN A 66.77.88.99
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
ns2.server.net. 1263 IN A 81.169.148.41
domain1.com. 1800 IN A 66.77.88.99
ns.server.net. 1263 IN A 81.169.163.40
;; Query time: 41 msec
;; SERVER: *.*.*.7#53(*.*.*.7)
;; WHEN: Tue Nov 23 11:55:23 2010
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 207
host `hostname`
h1234567.server.net A 66.77.88.99 |
The server is a virtual-server (*.server.net), hosted by an ISP. We are limited in changing DNS-recordsets. Do have a suggestion, what we can do, to send mails over port 25? The result of dig on each domain (domain#.com), wich is registered on this server, is similar as shown above, except the name of the domain (domain1.com).
@phoenix:
The reason because of we are trying to be able to send mails over port 25 is, that the f***ing Microsoft Mail Clients (Outlook, Outlook Express, Live Mail) are not able to accept the selfsigned certs as thunderbird it does. Till now we didn't find a solution or a workaround, to suppress the "security"-warnings, which appear when sending/receiving mails by using the secure ports. If you can provide a solution, I would be greatful. In that case, I would prefer, as you suggest, that the mailusers uses the secure ports.
Regards
Raui