Zimbra offers Open Source email server software and shared calendar for Linux and the Mac
Go Back   Zimbra :: Forums > Zimbra Collaboration Suite > Administrators

Welcome to the Zimbra :: Forums!
Welcome, if you would like to post a comment please register. We also encourage you to explore all things Zimbra with our team and members of the community.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2010, 01:25 AM
Senior Member
 
Posts: 74
Question best of the lot

Found many appliance for filtering in the market. Can i have help in some of the few what are our customers are using. Sonicwall ES400 email security appliance, baraccuda,titan spam.Our firm has around 10000+ users.

Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2010, 04:59 AM
Intermediate Member
 
Posts: 19
Default

I'm not sure that Zimbra needs a spam filter appliance installed in front of it, if it's correctly setup. But here's my experience with these types of things.

I've got alot of customers who have Exchange servers who are using a hosted spam filtering service. Postini (google), MXLogic, AppRiver, RedCondor are the ones I've used. At the spam filtering level they all do a pretty fair job, but mainly differ in support levels. Postini has almost no direct support, whereas with MXLogic you can actually talk to a person fairly quickly, and a small service like RedCondor answers the phone directly. But Postini probably scales the best for large enterprises. Interestingly enough the fact that it's a Google service is starting to become a disadvantage as we've had some very specific malware attacks get through Postini, and because they're so large, they're a very attractive target.

For appliances, Barracuda's is the preferred one. I don't have direct experience supporting it, but the company generally has good support, and I've found their BarracudaCentral BRBL to be very good in blocking spam when added to Zimbra.

With such a high User base you probably should look at Cisco Ironport. It has alot of features you're likely to want in a large enterprise, and can likely afford to pay for.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2011, 11:41 PM
Senior Member
 
Posts: 74
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmcbride View Post
I'm not sure that Zimbra needs a spam filter appliance installed in front of it, if it's correctly setup. But here's my experience with these types of things.

I've got alot of customers who have Exchange servers who are using a hosted spam filtering service. Postini (google), MXLogic, AppRiver, RedCondor are the ones I've used. At the spam filtering level they all do a pretty fair job, but mainly differ in support levels. Postini has almost no direct support, whereas with MXLogic you can actually talk to a person fairly quickly, and a small service like RedCondor answers the phone directly. But Postini probably scales the best for large enterprises. Interestingly enough the fact that it's a Google service is starting to become a disadvantage as we've had some very specific malware attacks get through Postini, and because they're so large, they're a very attractive target.

For appliances, Barracuda's is the preferred one. I don't have direct experience supporting it, but the company generally has good support, and I've found their BarracudaCentral BRBL to be very good in blocking spam when added to Zimbra.

With such a high User base you probably should look at Cisco Ironport. It has alot of features you're likely to want in a large enterprise, and can likely afford to pay for.
Does anybody use Spam FIlter for their Zimbra?
Hope you can provide with the common used filter appliance.

Is anyone using SpamTitan as well?

Expecting your fast response.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads

Why Join?

Registering let's you ask questions, makes it easier to search, displays any files attached to posts, and notifies you about replies.

blog.zimbra.com




 

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.