Zimbra offers Open Source email server software and shared calendar for Linux and the Mac
Go Back   Zimbra :: Forums > Zimbra Collaboration Suite > Administrators

Welcome to the Zimbra :: Forums!
Welcome, if you would like to post a comment please register. We also encourage you to explore all things Zimbra with our team and members of the community.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2010, 03:12 AM
Senior Member
 
Posts: 66
Default Contact names after 'M' missing in GAL

I updated with the 6.08 patch on firday - and all seemed well.

Now that monday morning is here users had notices that every name in teh GAL after 'M' (Mary, Mike, Mitch etc) does not display when selecting the 'TO' button when composing a new email in the webclient.

The 'Next' button is greyed out.....

When looking through Personal conatcst though, all seems well....
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2010, 12:26 PM
Starter Member
 
Posts: 1
Default

Hello
I have exactly the problem, after applying the patch, users can touch only the first 50.

Last edited by phoenix; 09-20-2010 at 11:16 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2010, 02:10 PM
Senior Member
 
Posts: 56
Default

Same Problem!! What is worng? Why Zimbra employess have not contacted with us?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2010, 03:57 AM
Moderator
 
Posts: 2,207
Default

Did you file a bug in the bugzilla (with as much data as possible in order to reproduce)?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2010, 09:31 AM
Moderator
 
Posts: 6,237
Default

Can't seem to repo yet.

Testing a bare 6.0.8 the 'To:' address picker is only browseable (the next button) with a galsync account enabled.

(Most results returned by gal search set to 60 with 80 accounts provisioned - but the 60 seems to have no effect so we must be using a hardcoded page amount in that particular location.) I'd have to check prior versions/bugzilla to see when that changed, but seems intentional (requiring galsync).

Based on timing of the first post in that thread it would be referring to P1 - so I installed that and can't find a behavior difference.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2010, 10:02 AM
Senior Member
 
Posts: 56
Default galsync problem

zmgsautil forcesync -a {galsyncAccount} -n {datasource}

Seems like gal requires to be manual syncronized.

:PoKo:
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-04-2010, 08:42 AM
Trained Alumni
 
Posts: 13
Default

We have two test environments. One that we upgraded from 5.0.23 and one that was a fresh install. We are seeing this in the upgraded environment but not the fresh install enviroment.

Thanks,

Doug
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads

Why Join?

Registering let's you ask questions, makes it easier to search, displays any files attached to posts, and notifies you about replies.

blog.zimbra.com




 

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.