SNAT rule? LOL What's that!?!
Do you mean a NAT rule?
I'm not sure what to do...?
I'm using PFSense.
A port forward?
I think you're saying to direct 162 to 182?
SNAT rule? LOL What's that!?!
Do you mean a NAT rule?
I'm not sure what to do...?
I'm using PFSense.
A port forward?
I think you're saying to direct 162 to 182?
Yeah, NAT can be done on inbound traffic (destination NAT - DNAT) or outbound traffic (source NAT - SNAT). It's been a year or so since I looked at pfSense, so I can't remember exactly how the interface is laid out, but the NAT rules section is where it will likely be. Some vendors call is masquerading or 1:1 NAT as well (that's both DNAT and SNAT).
I haven't been using the 1:1 but instead the port forward...
I added a NAT entry for 53, 25, and 587 pointing 162 to the internal IP of the email server....but doesn't look like it's changed anything...?
BTW - I finally got a response from my ISP XO... they're going to try to contact SORBS to get the ip delisted.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)