Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: No more Canonical Address.. and now?

  1. #1
    stich86 is offline Special Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    123
    Rep Power
    7

    Default No more Canonical Address.. and now?

    Hi guys,

    i've seen that on ZCS 6.0.7 there is no more Canonical Address..
    I use this feature because I activate BB on a different domain (owned by ZCS), but when I reply from Webclient or BB it will send with the Canonical Address..

    Is it possibile to modify via zmprov?

  2. #2
    phoenix is offline Zimbra Consultant & Moderator
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Vannes, France
    Posts
    23,201
    Rep Power
    56

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stich86 View Post
    Hi guys,

    i've seen that on ZCS 6.0.7 there is no more Canonical Address..
    It's just that it's currently not available via the Admin UI.


    Quote Originally Posted by stich86 View Post
    I use this feature because I activate BB on a different domain (owned by ZCS), but when I reply from Webclient or BB it will send with the Canonical Address..

    Is it possibile to modify via zmprov?
    The feature will be removed in some future verrsion of Zimbra, you need to find another method to achieve what you're currently doing.
    Regards


    Bill


    Acompli: A new adventure for Co-Founder KevinH.

  3. #3
    Vladimir is offline Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    220
    Rep Power
    7

    Default

    Why oh why did you guys remove this? What was it hurting? There are pleanty of users who don't want to worry about setting up persona's, have big enough hats that they don't want to hear about it, and the canonical address made life so much easier for the admins.

  4. #4
    phoenix is offline Zimbra Consultant & Moderator
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Vannes, France
    Posts
    23,201
    Rep Power
    56

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vladimir View Post
    Why oh why did you guys remove this? What was it hurting? There are pleanty of users who don't want to worry about setting up persona's, have big enough hats that they don't want to hear about it, and the canonical address made life so much easier for the admins.
    You can find the answer to your question 'why' in the bug report.
    Regards


    Bill


    Acompli: A new adventure for Co-Founder KevinH.

  5. #5
    Vladimir is offline Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    220
    Rep Power
    7

    Default

    I'm not sure I actually follow that line of reasoning, but maybe I haven't had enough coffee today. The problem I'm running into is the one described at the end of comment #38. There really needs to be way for a domain admin (without zmprov access) to set a prefered address for a user, without the user modifing persona's.

  6. #6
    jterhune is offline Active Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    30
    Rep Power
    7

    Default

    I'm scared of this becoming a problem for us.

    We have all our accounts created as studentID@domain.edu with aliases and canonical addresses for each user of first.last@domain.edu so that users log in via their ID number (as they are stored in LDAP) but send and receive mail through their first.last address.

    If canonical addresses are dying, we're clearly need to change the way we do things. What is the appropriate way to be doing things in the future, and is there a clean migration path that avoids me remaking several thousand accounts?

    Thanks,
    John

  7. #7
    mackoftrack's Avatar
    mackoftrack is offline Special Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    135
    Rep Power
    6

    Default

    I see no reason to deprecate canonical addresses. We use this feature and need its functionality. I am very concerned that Zimbra is planning to remove this feature.

  8. #8
    phoenix is offline Zimbra Consultant & Moderator
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Vannes, France
    Posts
    23,201
    Rep Power
    56

    Default

    If you read the first comment in the bug report you'll see the reason why it doesn't do what what people think it does, you will also see that the 'canonical address' isn't necessary as you can use Identities to get the same behaviour.
    Regards


    Bill


    Acompli: A new adventure for Co-Founder KevinH.

  9. #9
    Vladimir is offline Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    220
    Rep Power
    7

    Default

    So what was the problem with replacing what it did with setting a default identity? There are reasons why users don't want to handle this themselves, good or bad.

  10. #10
    keithop is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    61
    Rep Power
    9

    Thumbs down

    Quote Originally Posted by Vladimir View Post
    So what was the problem with replacing what it did with setting a default identity? There are reasons why users don't want to handle this themselves, good or bad.
    This is very true.

    We have many zimbra customers who for various reasons are setup on domain something.com but must have all their outbound email sent from somethingelse.com. They don't want any possibility of their employees changing their identities etc.

    This was exceptionally easy with every version up until canonical name was removed. We simply did this as a simple admin task for them, job done, everyone happy.

    If "canonical name" was confusing, why not just rename it to something sensible "Outgoing SMTP address" or something. This is something that remains easy to do on Exchange so this is a step backwards for zimbra unless I'm missing a nice easy and equally quick way to do it in Zimbra.
    Zimbra hosting - Instant online setup - www.simplymailsolutions.com

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •