Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 29 of 29

Thread: Zimbra plan with IM

  1. #21
    phoenix is online now Zimbra Consultant & Moderator
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Vannes, France
    Posts
    23,581
    Rep Power
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dave_kempe View Post
    Still doesn't mean we shouldn't agitate for an ongoing decent IM solution.
    I'm not suggesting otherwise, I'm merely pointing out (for future readers) that the feature as it currently exists will be removed in a not-too-distant release.

    I don't believe, however, that the use of an IM server within Zimbra is a viable option and unless there's a major shift in policy I guess it will be removed as stated in the bug report. What replaces it should be the discussion, surely? The bug report states in the first comment that there will be integration with external IM server and the (current) bug reports that cover that are:

    Bug 19398 – Integration with external IM servers (XMPP proxy support)
    Bug 42786 – Implement XMPP "Send File" in ZWC
    Bug 45932 – Remove IM server

    Perhaps those RFEs should receive the attention of this discussion and votes (if you haven't already).
    Regards


    Bill


    Acompli: A new adventure for Co-Founder KevinH.

  2. #22
    i2ambler is offline Special Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    161
    Rep Power
    5

    Default

    The release notes state that the IM client is to be removed at a future date as well.. Thats a real bummer. As several others have said in this post, we have become somewhat reliant on the IM feature - whether beta or not. It seems to save alot of time as well as valuable email storage space, since users tend to like to IM each other rather than send emails then wait for a response..

  3. #23
    phoenix is online now Zimbra Consultant & Moderator
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Vannes, France
    Posts
    23,581
    Rep Power
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by i2ambler View Post
    The release notes state that the IM client is to be removed at a future date as well..
    The RFE has been around for nine months and mentioned on the forums for a while (this thread was started soon after the RFE was filed).

    Quote Originally Posted by i2ambler View Post
    Thats a real bummer. As several others have said in this post, we have become somewhat reliant on the IM feature - whether beta or not. It seems to save alot of time as well as valuable email storage space, since users tend to like to IM each other rather than send emails then wait for a response..
    As I mentioned above, the aim is to integrate an external IM server into the Web UI so feel free to add your comments and votes to the RFEs I've listed above. There's nothing to stop you continuing this thread but the most impact is by commenting/voting on the RFEs.
    Regards


    Bill


    Acompli: A new adventure for Co-Founder KevinH.

  4. #24
    mdeneen is offline Active Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    45
    Rep Power
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phoenix View Post
    The RFE has been around for nine months and mentioned on the forums for a while (this thread was started soon after the RFE was filed).

    As I mentioned above, the aim is to integrate an external IM server into the Web UI so feel free to add your comments and votes to the RFEs I've listed above. There's nothing to stop you continuing this thread but the most impact is by commenting/voting on the RFEs.
    I'm a bit confused as to how integrating an external IM server is of any use if the ZWC IM client is removed.

    Am I reading you incorrectly?
    Last edited by mdeneen; 02-08-2011 at 10:04 AM.

  5. #25
    phoenix is online now Zimbra Consultant & Moderator
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Vannes, France
    Posts
    23,581
    Rep Power
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mdeneen View Post
    I'm a bit confused as to how integrating an external IM server is of any use if the ZWC IM client is removed.

    Am I reading you incorrectly?
    Yes, you are. Although the Release Notes state the IM Client feature is being removed as well as the server the bug report (and the links I posted above) point you to the intent to integrate with an external IM server - read the Functional Requirement document that's attached to RFE 19398.
    Regards


    Bill


    Acompli: A new adventure for Co-Founder KevinH.

  6. #26
    jerryboi is offline Special Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    111
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Hello Bill,

    I am a little confused about this too, can you please explain that bugzilla entry? The beta IM client has been removed but a new one is being developed? And the new one is being developed along the lines outlined in the Functional Requirements, is that the case? That client zimlet described in the pdf is not very different from the beta client that was removed, by the look of it. Can we expect a new client with much the same functionalities as the removed one? What release is that scheduled for? Do you have a roadmap I can check?

  7. #27
    phoenix is online now Zimbra Consultant & Moderator
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Vannes, France
    Posts
    23,581
    Rep Power
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jerryboi View Post
    I am a little confused about this too, can you please explain that bugzilla entry? The beta IM client has been removed but a new one is being developed?
    The IM server in the current version of Zimbra is the part that was Beta.

    Quote Originally Posted by jerryboi View Post
    And the new one is being developed along the lines outlined in the Functional Requirements, is that the case?
    Most likely. The IM client facilites in future version of Zimbra will connect to an external (to ZCS) IM server.

    Quote Originally Posted by jerryboi View Post
    That client zimlet described in the pdf is not very different from the beta client that was removed, by the look of it. Can we expect a new client with much the same functionalities as the removed one? What release is that scheduled for? Do you have a roadmap I can check?
    I'm afraid you'll have to wait for further details in the Product Portal to see which version it's targeted for.
    Regards


    Bill


    Acompli: A new adventure for Co-Founder KevinH.

  8. #28
    jerryboi is offline Special Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    111
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Thank you, it is all clear now. Zimbra Product Management Portal used to be a little more informative regarding future releases. Looking at it now one can't help the feeling that vmware is pulling the plug on zimbra.

  9. #29
    phoenix is online now Zimbra Consultant & Moderator
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Vannes, France
    Posts
    23,581
    Rep Power
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jerryboi View Post
    Thank you, it is all clear now. Zimbra Product Management Portal used to be a little more informative regarding future releases. Looking at it now one can't help the feeling that vmware is pulling the plug on zimbra.
    I don't know how you arrive at that conclusion, VMWare has put a heavy and continuing investment into the success of Zimbra - it wouldn't make sense to do otherwise. The reason you don't see anything in there for the next major version is rather simple (and less of a conspiracy theory ), the next version is still under heavy development and there's nothing to place in PM at the moment. When it's closer to confirming which bugs/RFEs will eventually be targeted for the release you'll see the details in PM.
    Regards


    Bill


    Acompli: A new adventure for Co-Founder KevinH.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-18-2011, 10:15 PM
  2. Replies: 22
    Last Post: 12-02-2007, 05:05 PM
  3. Zimbra shutdowns every n hours.
    By Andrewb in forum Administrators
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 08-14-2007, 08:55 AM
  4. zmtlsctl give LDAP error
    By sourcehound in forum Administrators
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-11-2007, 03:48 PM
  5. huge log size
    By rmvg in forum Administrators
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-02-2007, 10:39 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •