Zimbra offers Open Source email server software and shared calendar for Linux and the Mac
Go Back   Zimbra :: Forums > Zimbra Collaboration Suite > Administrators

Welcome to the Zimbra :: Forums!
Welcome, if you would like to post a comment please register. We also encourage you to explore all things Zimbra with our team and members of the community.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-12-2010, 10:15 AM
Senior Member
 
Posts: 60
Default Zimbra backups taking a *long* time

We've been putting off upgrades to our Zimbra server because we haven't been able to get a good backup. Apparently one of the full backups was corrupt and the incrementals couldn't work from it, but the fulls kept dying.

Last night I babysat the full backup that I started at 6pm. It just finished, 18 hours later. There are 426 users on the system and the backup (not using any of the options) takes about 400MB of disk space. During the backup the server load average hovers between 6-8 (usually it's 1-3).

This is just a 'zmbackup -f -a all'. Should it take this long? Last time we did a backup it was only taking three hours, but I don't know yet if user mailbox sizes have changed significantly.

I haven't tried the synchronous backup flag yet.

Thanks for any tips/pointers.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-12-2010, 01:27 PM
Moderator
 
Posts: 1,554
Default

it usually comes down to storage. what kind of storage is your /opt/zimbra/backup on?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-12-2010, 01:34 PM
Senior Member
 
Posts: 60
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bdial View Post
it usually comes down to storage. what kind of storage is your /opt/zimbra/backup on?
It used to be on the same 4.5 TB hardware RAID that the main data store was on, but now it's on a separate attached disk.

data writes to this disk are about twice as fast as data reads the RAID.

What's odd is the sudden slowness since the last upgrade to 5.0.18, increasing the time six-fold.

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-12-2010, 01:36 PM
Moderator
 
Posts: 1,554
Default

were you running compressed backups before? i think i've seen cases where on upgrades the -z flag was removed from the zmbackup schedule. comprssed backups have always ran faster for me
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-12-2010, 01:42 PM
Senior Member
 
Posts: 60
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bdial View Post
were you running compressed backups before? i think i've seen cases where on upgrades the -z flag was removed from the zmbackup schedule. comprssed backups have always ran faster for me
We weren't running compressed backups before. I tried it a couple of times, but it slowed things down even more. The machine has two quad-core Xeon E5345 processors and 32GB of RAM.

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-27-2010, 05:26 AM
Intermediate Member
 
Posts: 18
Default

Hi Chris - did you ever resolve this issue? After a v5 to v6 upgrade, our full backups are taking a lot longer than they used to. Sounded like a similar issue. Thanks for any info.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-27-2010, 10:31 AM
Partner (VAR/HSP)
 
Posts: 425
Default

6.0.x uses zip compression. That might be why it takes longer. Have you tried disabling it with the --noZip addition?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-27-2010, 05:25 PM
Intermediate Member
 
Posts: 18
Default

How did so many of us miss that on a v6 upgrade? Thanks for the pointer, I'm sure that is it, especially with other threads talking the same:

Backup compression

6.0.2 Huge increase in disk usage?

Network edition backup question - number of incremental/fulls ?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads

Why Join?

Registering let's you ask questions, makes it easier to search, displays any files attached to posts, and notifies you about replies.

blog.zimbra.com




 

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.