verify error in mailbox.log

[brainocide]

Hi,

Need help to verify whether this log below is some kind of problem or not. FYI, i just upgraded from 5.0.18 -> 6.0.3 and certificate still valid. After upgrade i renew Self-Signed Certificate.



This log from /opt/zimbra/log/mailbox.log (mailbox server)
===============================

2009-12-16 00:00:09,344 INFO [LmtpServer-2645] [name=jamal@qqq.gov.my;mid=8;ip=202.188.163.178;] cache - initializing fold
er and tag caches for mailbox 8
2009-12-16 00:00:09,348 INFO [LmtpServer-2645] [name=jamal@qqq.gov.my;mid=8;ip=202.188.163.178;] mailop - Adding Message:
id=23467, Message-ID=<20091215171123.jkvgscforyw@mx1.yourheartworm.c om>, parentId=-1, folderId=2, folderName=Inbox.
2009-12-16 00:00:09,350 ERROR [LmtpServer-2645] [name=jamal@qqq.gov.my;mid=8;ip=202.188.163.178;] jsieve - Evaluation faile
d. Reason: null
2009-12-16 00:00:09,350 INFO [LmtpServer-2645] [name=jamal@qqq.gov.my;mid=8;ip=202.188.163.178;] cache - initializing fold
er and tag caches for mailbox 8
2009-12-16 00:00:09,352 WARN [LmtpServer-2645] [name=jamal@qqq.gov.my;mid=8;ip=202.188.163.178;] filter - An error occurre
d while processing filter rules. Filing message to /Inbox.
com.zimbra.cs.filter.ZimbraSieveException
at com.zimbra.cs.filter.ZimbraMailAdapter.executeActi ons(ZimbraMailAdapter.java:226)
at org.apache.jsieve.SieveFactory.evaluate(SieveFacto ry.java:164)
at com.zimbra.cs.filter.RuleManager.applyRulesToIncom ingMessage(RuleManager.java:348)
at com.zimbra.cs.filter.RuleManager.applyRulesToIncom ingMessage(RuleManager.java:311)
at com.zimbra.cs.lmtpserver.ZimbraLmtpBackend.deliver MessageToLocalMailboxes(ZimbraLmtpBackend.java:425 )
at com.zimbra.cs.lmtpserver.ZimbraLmtpBackend.deliver MessageToLocalMailboxes(ZimbraLmtpBackend.java:257 )
at com.zimbra.cs.lmtpserver.ZimbraLmtpBackend.deliver (ZimbraLmtpBackend.java:162)
at com.zimbra.cs.lmtpserver.LmtpHandler.processMessag eData(LmtpHandler.java:365)
at com.zimbra.cs.lmtpserver.TcpLmtpHandler.continueDA TA(TcpLmtpHandler.java:72)
at com.zimbra.cs.lmtpserver.LmtpHandler.doDATA(LmtpHa ndler.java:350)
at com.zimbra.cs.lmtpserver.LmtpHandler.processComman d(LmtpHandler.java:170)
at com.zimbra.cs.lmtpserver.TcpLmtpHandler.processCom mand(TcpLmtpHandler.java:66)
at com.zimbra.cs.tcpserver.ProtocolHandler.processCon nection(ProtocolHandler.java:175)
at com.zimbra.cs.tcpserver.ProtocolHandler.run(Protoc olHandler.java:132)
at EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent.PooledExecutor$Wo rker.run(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
Caused by: com.zimbra.cs.mailbox.MailServiceException: mailbox exceeded quota of 104857600 bytes
ExceptionId:LmtpServer-2645:1260892809349:5a5950032c5c661e
Code:mail.QUOTA_EXCEEDED Arglimit, NUM, "104857600")
at com.zimbra.cs.mailbox.MailServiceException.QUOTA_E XCEEDED(MailServiceException.java:314)
at com.zimbra.cs.mailbox.Mailbox.updateSize(Mailbox.j ava:873)
at com.zimbra.cs.mailbox.Mailbox.updateSize(Mailbox.j ava:859)
at com.zimbra.cs.mailbox.MailItem.finishCreation(Mail Item.java:1430)
at com.zimbra.cs.mailbox.Message.createInternal(Messa ge.java:444)
at com.zimbra.cs.mailbox.Message.create(Message.java: 360)
at com.zimbra.cs.mailbox.Mailbox.addMessageInternal(M ailbox.java:4446)
at com.zimbra.cs.mailbox.Mailbox.addMessage(Mailbox.j ava:4293)
at com.zimbra.cs.mailbox.Mailbox.addMessage(Mailbox.j ava:4226)
at com.zimbra.cs.mailbox.Mailbox.addMessage(Mailbox.j ava:4186)
at com.zimbra.cs.filter.IncomingMessageHandler.addMes sage(IncomingMessageHandler.java:116)
at com.zimbra.cs.filter.IncomingMessageHandler.implic itKeep(IncomingMessageHandler.java:109)
at com.zimbra.cs.filter.ZimbraMailAdapter.doDefaultFi ling(ZimbraMailAdapter.java:284)
at com.zimbra.cs.filter.ZimbraMailAdapter.executeActi ons(ZimbraMailAdapter.java:188)
... 15 more
2009-12-16 00:00:09,353 INFO [LmtpServer-2645] [name=jamal@qqq.gov.my;mid=8;ip=202.188.163.178;] mailop - Adding Message:
id=23467, Message-ID=<20091215171123.jkvgscforyw@mx1.yourheartworm.c om>, parentId=-1, folderId=2, folderName=Inbox.
2009-12-16 00:00:09,355 INFO [LmtpServer-2645] [name=jamal@qqq.gov.my;mid=8;ip=202.188.163.178;] lmtp - rejecting message
jamal@qqq.gov.my: overquota
2009-12-16 00:00:09,355 INFO [LmtpServer-2645] [name=jamal@qqq.gov.my;mid=8;ip=202.188.163.178;] lmtp - 452 4.2.2 Over quo
ta (DATA)
2009-12-16 00:00:09,356 INFO [LmtpServer-2645] [] ProtocolHandler - Handler exiting normally



This log from /opt/zimbra/log/mailbox.log (mailbox server)
=========================================
2009-12-17 07:49:33,261 WARN [btpool0-32] [] log - SSL renegotiate denied: java.nio.channels.SocketChannel[connected local=/
202.188.163.177:7071 remote=/202.188.163.178:37712]
2009-12-17 07:53:20,208 WARN [btpool0-22] [] log - javax.net.ssl.SSLException: Received fatal alert: unknown_ca
2009-12-17 07:55:25,849 WARN [btpool0-32] [] log - SSL renegotiate denied: java.nio.channels.SocketChannel[connected local=/
202.188.163.177:7071 remote=/202.188.163.178:39975]
2009-12-17 08:01:04,904 WARN [btpool0-32] [] log - javax.net.ssl.SSLException: Received fatal alert: unknown_ca
2009-12-17 08:01:08,956 WARN [btpool0-32] [] log - javax.net.ssl.SSLException: Received fatal alert: unknown_ca
2009-12-17 08:01:16,951 WARN [btpool0-22] [] log - SSL renegotiate denied: java.nio.channels.SocketChannel[connected local=/
202.188.163.177:7071 remote=/202.188.163.178:42174]
2009-12-17 08:01:29,516 WARN [btpool0-32] [] log - SSL renegotiate denied: java.nio.channels.SocketChannel[connected local=/
202.188.163.177:7071 remote=/202.188.163.178:42178]
2009-12-17 08:01:30,402 WARN [btpool0-32] [] log - SSL renegotiate denied: java.nio.channels.SocketChannel[connected local=/
202.188.163.177:7071 remote=/202.188.163.178:42179]



/var/log/maillog (mailbox server)
========================

Dec 13 23:59:15 smtp postfix/trivial-rewrite[18796]: fatal: proxy:ldap:/opt/zimbra/conf/ldap-vad.cf(0,lock|fold_fix): table lookup problem
Dec 13 23:59:16 smtp postfix/trivial-rewrite[27175]: fatal: proxy:ldap:/opt/zimbra/conf/ldap-vad.cf(0,lock|fold_fix): table lookup problem
Dec 13 23:59:17 smtp postfix/trivial-rewrite[27176]: fatal: proxy:ldap:/opt/zimbra/conf/ldap-vad.cf(0,lock|fold_fix): table lookup problem
Dec 15 13:39:25 smtp postfix/trivial-rewrite[6363]: fatal: proxy:ldap:/opt/zimbra/conf/ldap-vad.cf(0,lock|fold_fix): table lookup problem
Dec 15 13:39:35 smtp postfix/trivial-rewrite[9776]: fatal: proxy:ldap:/opt/zimbra/conf/ldap-vad.cf(0,lock|fold_fix): table lookup problem
Dec 15 13:39:44 smtp postfix/trivial-rewrite[9933]: fatal: proxy:ldap:/opt/zimbra/conf/ldap-vad.cf(0,lock|fold_fix): table lookup problem
Dec 15 13:39:47 smtp postfix/trivial-rewrite[10241]: fatal: proxy:ldap:/opt/zimbra/conf/ldap-vad.cf(0,lock|fold_fix): table lookup problem
Dec 15 13:39:53 smtp postfix/trivial-rewrite[10549]: fatal: proxy:ldap:/opt/zimbra/conf/ldap-vad.cf(0,lock|fold_fix): table lookup problem
Dec 16 18:58:06 smtp postfix/trivial-rewrite[3832]: fatal: proxy:ldap:/opt/zimbra/conf/ldap-vad.cf(0,lock|fold_fix): table lookup problem
Dec 16 18:58:08 smtp postfix/trivial-rewrite[23771]: fatal: proxy:ldap:/opt/zimbra/conf/ldap-vad.cf(0,lock|fold_fix): table lookup problem


/var/log/zimbra.log (mailbox server)
========================

Dec 17 10:43:37 smtp postfix/smtpd[21363]: too many errors after DATA from unknown[113.193.40.169]
Dec 17 10:44:06 smtp postfix/smtpd[15590]: too many errors after RCPT from unknown[113.167.177.53]
Dec 17 10:44:26 smtp postfix/smtpd[10792]: too many errors after DATA from unknown[186.112.25.37]
Dec 17 10:44:29 smtp postfix/smtpd[21363]: too many errors after DATA from unknown[117.205.2.32]
Dec 17 10:45:23 smtp postfix/smtpd[10792]: too many errors after RCPT from unknown[186.112.25.37]



/var/log/zimbra.log (mailbox server)
========================

Dec 17 13:38:14 smtp saslauthd[6371]: zmpost: url='https://mbs1.perak.gov.my:7071/service/admin/soap/' returned buffer->data='<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope"><soap:Header><context xmlns="urn:zimbra"><change token="6103"/></context></soap:Header><soap:Body><AuthResponse xmlns="urn:zimbraAccount"><authToken>0_410264b06ce af9a1f926205de0e5cc1938beeb09_69643d33363a38663266 393630662d306265632d343630612d626465362d3137303365 356432306161373b6578703d31333a31323631323031303934 3731313b747970653d363a7a696d6272613b</authToken><lifetime>172800000</lifetime><skin>beach</skin></AuthResponse></soap:Body></soap:Envelope>', hti->error=''
Dec 17 13:39:13 smtp postfix/smtpd[30556]: warning: network_biopair_interop: error reading 5 bytes from the network: Connection reset by peer
Dec 17 13:39:39 smtp saslauthd[6370]: zmpost: url='https://mbs1.perak.gov.my:7071/service/admin/soap/' returned buffer->data='<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope"><soap:Header><context xmlns="urn:zimbra"><change token="10522"/></context></soap:Header><soap:Body><AuthResponse xmlns="urn:zimbraAccount"><authToken>0_256fc217bf2 217804a09bb1ef175012213a5fdd2_69643d33363a33393865 363338312d393733382d346338652d613932352d6565653233 393233306438343b6578703d31333a31323631323031313739 3532323b747970653d363a7a696d6272613b</authToken><lifetime>172800000</lifetime><skin>beach</skin></AuthResponse></soap:Body></soap:Envelope>', hti->error=''


This log from /var/log/zimbra.log (ldap server)
===================================

Dec 17 11:27:12 ldap slapd[2762]: slap_queue_csn: queing 0x1fcfb26 20091217032712.301014Z#000000#000#000000
Dec 17 11:27:12 ldap slapd[2762]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0xf722f30 20091217032712.301014Z#000000#000#000000
Dec 17 11:36:42 ldap slapd[2762]: slap_queue_csn: queing 0x1bceb26 20091217033642.588087Z#000000#000#000000
Dec 17 11:36:42 ldap slapd[2762]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0xf722180 20091217033642.588087Z#000000#000#000000
Dec 17 12:05:32 ldap slapd[2762]: slap_queue_csn: queing 0x26d8b26 20091217040532.501166Z#000000#000#000000
Dec 17 12:05:32 ldap slapd[2762]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0xf90c240 20091217040532.501166Z#000000#000#000000
Dec 17 12:21:02 ldap slapd[2762]: slap_queue_csn: queing 0x26d8b26 20091217042102.423461Z#000000#000#000000
Dec 17 12:21:02 ldap slapd[2762]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0x9f66720 20091217042102.423461Z#000000#000#000000
Dec 17 13:22:37 ldap slapd[2762]: slap_queue_csn: queing 0x1bceb26 20091217052237.981596Z#000000#000#000000
Dec 17 13:22:37 ldap slapd[2762]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0xf5f6780 20091217052237.981596Z#000000#000#000000
Dec 17 13:24:16 ldap slapd[2762]: slap_queue_csn: queing 0x9acdb26 20091217052416.466686Z#000000#000#000000
Dec 17 13:24:16 ldap slapd[2762]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0xf722030 20091217052416.466686Z#000000#000#000000
Dec 17 13:25:18 ldap slapd[2762]: slap_queue_csn: queing 0x9acdb26 20091217052518.869514Z#000000#000#000000
Dec 17 13:25:18 ldap slapd[2762]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0xf90ca80 20091217052518.869514Z#000000#000#000000

[ArcaneMagus]

In case you were still wondering, looks like a message was attempted to be delivered to an account that was over quota so the message was rejected.

[maumar]

I wold give a look to this:

2009-12-17 07:53:20,208 WARN [btpool0-22] [] log - javax.net.ssl.SSLException: Received fatal alert: unknown_ca

it seems you have some issue with your cert's ca

which is your ssl cert ca?

[mnbvmnbv]

Originally Posted by brainocide

This log from /var/log/zimbra.log (ldap server)
===================================

Dec 17 11:27:12 ldap slapd[2762]: slap_queue_csn: queing 0x1fcfb26 20091217032712.301014Z#000000#000#000000
Dec 17 11:27:12 ldap slapd[2762]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0xf722f30 20091217032712.301014Z#000000#000#000000
Dec 17 11:36:42 ldap slapd[2762]: slap_queue_csn: queing 0x1bceb26 20091217033642.588087Z#000000#000#000000
Dec 17 11:36:42 ldap slapd[2762]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0xf722180 20091217033642.588087Z#000000#000#000000
Dec 17 12:05:32 ldap slapd[2762]: slap_queue_csn: queing 0x26d8b26 20091217040532.501166Z#000000#000#000000
Dec 17 12:05:32 ldap slapd[2762]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0xf90c240 20091217040532.501166Z#000000#000#000000
Dec 17 12:21:02 ldap slapd[2762]: slap_queue_csn: queing 0x26d8b26 20091217042102.423461Z#000000#000#000000
Dec 17 12:21:02 ldap slapd[2762]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0x9f66720 20091217042102.423461Z#000000#000#000000
Dec 17 13:22:37 ldap slapd[2762]: slap_queue_csn: queing 0x1bceb26 20091217052237.981596Z#000000#000#000000
Dec 17 13:22:37 ldap slapd[2762]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0xf5f6780 20091217052237.981596Z#000000#000#000000
Dec 17 13:24:16 ldap slapd[2762]: slap_queue_csn: queing 0x9acdb26 20091217052416.466686Z#000000#000#000000
Dec 17 13:24:16 ldap slapd[2762]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0xf722030 20091217052416.466686Z#000000#000#000000
Dec 17 13:25:18 ldap slapd[2762]: slap_queue_csn: queing 0x9acdb26 20091217052518.869514Z#000000#000#000000
Dec 17 13:25:18 ldap slapd[2762]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0xf90ca80 20091217052518.869514Z#000000#000#000000

What kind of error is that?

I have the same and I'm really worry. Also, i see the process with top and i can see how de slapd process is overloaded. I have a ldap master / slave and i dont know if this problem if about the replic of the ldap's.

Thanks

[eolo999]

It seems that people never get a decent reply from the zimbra team!

they do seem to suggest: "Buy Network Edition."

[phoenix]

Originally Posted by eolo999

It seems that people never get a decent reply from the zimbra team!

Which 'Zimbra team' would that be? The people that post and help on these forums do so in their spare time to help others, they are not obliged to do so.

Originally Posted by eolo999

they do seem to suggest: "Buy Network Edition."

Really, who's suggested buying the NE version as a means to solving a problem in this thread or any others for that matter?

[eolo999]

Silence can often implicitly suggest solutions. I choose to post in this thread just because it was the last one i was reading after being frustrated a lot of times in the past. One example? zimbra logging: tens of threads, a lot of people has the same or similar problems and a big mess. Nor the wiki helps out. sorry. Perhaps we all should move to a really 'open' project.

[phoenix]

Originally Posted by eolo999

Silence can often implicitly suggest solutions. I choose to post in this thread just because it was the last one i was reading after being frustrated a lot of times in the past. One example? zimbra logging: tens of threads, a lot of people has the same or similar problems and a big mess. Nor the wiki helps out. sorry.

The problem I have with your post (apart from adding it to an old thread) is that you've mentioned nothing about you problem or question, you appear to have posted just to start some sort of flame war. I don't really notice you having contributed much to the forums but then maybe you're not interested in helping others? As I said, everyone that posts here has other commitments, real lives and jobs and perhaps they don't answer every post or reply in a timely manner, that's life - get over it!

Originally Posted by eolo999

Perhaps we all should move to a really 'open' project.

Perhaps you should do just that if you think there's one that suits you better, I don't notice anyone forcing you to use the products.

[eolo999]

i understand and in part it's true. The problem i have is the same of the original poster (slap_graduate_commit_csn) but all the time i come to this forum i end up with old threads that didn't receive answers. who to blame in first place? myself of course!

[phoenix]

Originally Posted by eolo999

i understand and in part it's true. The problem i have is the same of the original poster (slap_graduate_commit_csn) but all the time i come to this forum i end up with old threads that didn't receive answers. who to blame in first place?

I don't notice you having posted any information about a problem with your system, perhaps you don't really want any help or you're just posting to cause trouble?

Originally Posted by eolo999

...myself of course!

That's rather a childish comment. It is 'your problem' for posting the messages you've put in this thread rather than actually giving any information about the problem or even posting a question. If you prefer complain about the moderators and others that help on the forums then you'll get little sympathy from me. If, on the other hand, you have a problem and want to post full details of the problem then you may get some help, otherwise I'd suggest you take your own advice and move to another product.