Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Amavis going crazy with flagging

  1. #11
    stegbth is offline Special Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    134
    Rep Power
    6

    Default

    hi,

    as this box is running 5.0.22 i assume yes (didn't update my footer).

    The Question is, if
    zmlocalconfig -e amavis_dspam_enabled=FALSE

    is correct, why does there FALSE need be written big? as all flags are lowercase.

    I will try to get a header.

    best regards
    thomas
    zmcontrol -v
    1x Release 6.0.10_GA_2692.UBUNTU8_64 NETWORK edition.
    1x Release 6.0.14_GA_2928.UBUNTU8_64 NETWORK edition
    2x Release 7.1.3_GA_3346.UBUNTU10_64 NETWORK edition, Patch 7.1.3_P1
    1x Release 8.0.2.GA.5569.UBUNTU12.64 NETWORK edition

    2x Release 6.0.10_GA_2692.UBUNTU8_64 FOSS edition
    2x Release 7.2.2_GA_2852.UBUNTU10_64 FOSS edition
    1x Release 7.1.4_GA_2555.UBUNTU10_64 FOSS
    1x Release 8.0.3.GA.5664.UBUNTU12.64 FOSS edition

  2. #12
    imx
    imx is offline Special Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    131
    Rep Power
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stegbth View Post
    hi,

    as this box is running 5.0.22 i assume yes (didn't update my footer).

    The Question is, if
    zmlocalconfig -e amavis_dspam_enabled=FALSE

    is correct, why does there FALSE need be written big? as all flags are lowercase.

    I will try to get a header.

    best regards
    thomas
    It is/was a bug....as per my earlier post

  3. #13
    ewilen's Avatar
    ewilen is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    1,474
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Posting this possible solution to multiple threads...hope it helps someone.

    Enabling DSpam in Zimbra 6 Open Source Edition | slashdevslashnull.com

    Suspecting an issue with the DSpam DB, im not sure if this was left over from my previous playing or whether its like this out of the box, but clearing the DB solved the issue:

    Code:
    root@mambo:~# rm -rf /opt/zimbra/data/dspam/data/z/i/zimbra/
    root@mambo:~# su - zimbra
    zimbra@mambo:~$ zmcontrol stop; zmcontrol start
    EDIT: cross-posted to

    Enabling DSPAM
    Amavis going crazy with flagging
    All mail marked as spam
    DSPAM Issue
    Last edited by ewilen; 05-18-2010 at 11:23 AM.

  4. #14
    imx
    imx is offline Special Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    131
    Rep Power
    6

    Default

    haha thats actually my blog article - fixed it briefly, ie the random scoring - but i still see a score of 10 even though its not defined any where!!

  5. #15
    uxbod's Avatar
    uxbod is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    8,017
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    What is showing in the headers ?

  6. #16
    mrjohnsen is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    60
    Rep Power
    6

    Default

    And what Zimbra version are you running, imx? We are considering to enable DSPAM again at 6.0.61 if this issue is resolved now.

    Should we also clear out the dspam db to be on the safe side? Haven't used DSPAM since 6.0.2.

  7. #17
    ewilen's Avatar
    ewilen is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    1,474
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by uxbod View Post
    What is showing in the headers ?
    I haven't enabled DSPAM yet (was thinking about it, that's why I came across all these threads). The common factor seems to be that DSPAM is calculating a probability of 1, and this is generating a SA score of 10.

    E.g. from one of the threads (linked above, I just edited them in):

    X-DSPAM-Probability: 1.0000
    ...
    X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.487 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6
    tests=[AWL=0.086, BAYES_00=-2.599, DSPAM:Spam=10.000] autolearn=ham


    Of course the funny thing here is that amavis is deciding to autolearn the message as ham--basically ignoring DSPAM for the purpose of autolearning.

  8. #18
    imx
    imx is offline Special Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    131
    Rep Power
    6

    Default

    Yup this is exactly what i saw, i just gave up in the end...not sure when i last tried it - 6.0.4 maybe around February time? Was a few before the latest.

    From my blog:

    X-DSPAM-Result: Spam
    X-DSPAM-Class: Spam
    X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.99
    X-DSPAM-Probability: 1.0000
    X-DSPAM-Signature: N/A
    X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at xxxxxxxxx
    X-Spam-Flag: YES
    X-Spam-Score: 7.658
    X-Spam-Level: *******
    X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.658 tagged_above=-10 required=3.4
    tests=[AWL=0.258, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, DSPAM:Spam=10.000]
    autolearn=ham

  9. #19
    ewilen's Avatar
    ewilen is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    1,474
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Apologies for cross-posting again. I'd suggest that further discussion go to Enabling DSPAM, and that's where I'm posting another suggestion.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Amavis RAM Disk Setup - OK Now To Reimplement?
    By LMStone in forum Administrators
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-12-2011, 08:26 PM
  2. Daily mail report always reports "No messages found"
    By McPringle in forum Installation
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 06-13-2011, 08:57 AM
  3. Wrong amavis stats
    By claros in forum Administrators
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-06-2006, 06:06 AM
  4. Server Stats Cont...
    By DMRDave in forum Administrators
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 02-16-2006, 01:16 PM
  5. No data in server statistics
    By zap in forum Administrators
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: 02-13-2006, 11:39 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •