[SOLVED] ZCS6 RC1 NE - Black/White List

[uxbod]

I see they are held in LDAP

zmprov ga xxxx@xxxx.xxx amavisBlacklistSender 
# name xxxx@xxxx.xxx
amavisBlacklistSender: x@y.com

but how does Amavis reference them ?

[brian]

amavis is configured to look up account attrs in ldap. as part of it's normal process it also looks for the attrs defined in the amavis schema. amavisblacklistsender, amaviswhitelistsender etc etc and adds the results to the normal amavis *_sender_maps

[uxbod]

Hi Brian,

Many thanks for the information. I just noticed one of my regular emails got dropped into the spam bucket with the scoring

X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.884 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6
	tests=[AM:BOOST=5, BANG_GUAR=0.939, BAYES_00=-2.599,
	HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396,
	RDNS_NONE=0.1, SARE_OEM_S_PRICE=1, SARE_UNI=0.591, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
	autolearn=no

I checked out the AM:BOOST to see if it was a SA score but it looks like it has actually been introduced by Amavis. Looking it up I see that it was recently put into the code with the following description

- insert "AM:BOOST=boost_scores_list" into a list of triggered spam tests to make visible the internally generated per-recipient spam score boosts (like from: pen pals, soft white/black-listing, bounce killer) in the log and in the X-Spam-Status header field. The 'tests' list in X-Spam-Status or in the log (macro %T) can now look like: tests=[AM:BOOST=+1.3+0.51-1.1, BAYES_99=3.6, ...] Multiple summands appear in multi-recipient messages where boost scores differ between recipients (the list is squashed, only unique values are shown).

Any ideas as I do not have any B/W lists at the moment ?

[uxbod]

Okay, ignore found it in amavisd.conf.