Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Mail not going to user mailbox instead of status=sent on maillog

  1. #1
    dchristiaan is offline Intermediate Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    23
    Rep Power
    6

    Default Mail not going to user mailbox instead of status=sent on maillog

    Dear Expert,

    I have problem with my Zimbra.

    My /var/log/maillog said the mail was sent to our user but my user didnt' get it on his inbox.

    Jul 10 15:02:27 collosus postfix/lmtp[14342]: B345C18C04BC: to=<subagio@inssby.co.id>,relay=coll.xxx.com[192.168.1.16]:7025, delay=0.42, delays=0.04/0.02/0.01/0.36, dsn=2.1.5, status=sent (250 2.1.5 OK)

    User subagio@inssby.co.id didn't get the mail.

    My Zimbra version:
    Release 5.0.10_GA_2638.RHEL5_20081003052615 CentOS5 FOSS edition

    OS: CentOS release 5.2 (Final)

    I also have implement this patch Critical Security Issue

    Please your help for me to solve this problem.

    Thanks,
    Donny Christiaan.

  2. #2
    uxbod's Avatar
    uxbod is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    8,017
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Can you post the full entries from /var/log/zimbra.log for that email please. Does the user have any filters in place ? Have you tried re-indexing their mailbox aswell ?

  3. #3
    dchristiaan is offline Intermediate Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    23
    Rep Power
    6

    Default

    Hi uxbod,

    Thanks for your prompt reply.

    Here is my /var/log/zimbra.log
    ---------------------------------------------------------------
    Jul 10 15:02:26 collosus postfix/smtpd[14340]: B345C18C04BC: client=localhost.localdomain[127.0.0.1]
    Jul 10 15:02:26 collosus postfix/cleanup[14329]: B345C18C04BC: message-id=<4A56F57F.60303@insera.co.id>
    Jul 10 15:02:26 collosus postfix/smtpd[14340]: disconnect from localhost.localdomain[127.0.0.1]
    Jul 10 15:02:26 collosus postfix/qmgr[4738]: B345C18C04BC: from=<mis@insera.co.id>, size=26773, nrcpt=6 (queue active)
    Jul 10 15:02:26 collosus amavis[12756]: (12756-01) FWD via SMTP: <mis@insera.co.id> -> <anton@inssby.co.id>,<pakpos@inssby.co.id>,<sofi@i nssby.co.id>,<subagi
    o.to@inssby.co.id>,<subagio@inssby.c...i nssby.co.id>,BODY=8BITMIME 250 2.6.0 Ok, id=12756-01, from MTA([127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as
    B345C18C04BC
    Jul 10 15:02:26 collosus amavis[12756]: (12756-01) Passed CLEAN, LOCAL [192.168.1.37] [192.168.1.37] <mis@insera.co.id> -> <anton@inssby.co.id>,<pakpos@inssb
    y.co.id>,<sofi@inssby.co.id>,<subagio.to@inssby.co .id>,<subagio@inssby.co.id>,<yanto@inssby.co.id>, Message-ID: <4A56F57F.60303@insera.co.id>, mail_id: vxd3D
    jd9lliT, Hits: -3.608, size: 26138, queued_as: B345C18C04BC, 10851 ms
    Jul 10 15:02:26 collosus amavis[12756]: (12756-01) extra modules loaded: /opt/zimbra/zimbramon/lib/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Net/SSLeay/autosplit.ix, /opt
    /zimbra/zimbramon/lib/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Net/SSLeay/randomize.al, IO/Socket/SSL.pm, Net/LDAP/Extension.pm, Net/SSLeay.pm
    Jul 10 15:02:26 collosus postfix/smtp[15213]: 41C9818C01C4: to=<anton@inssby.co.id>, orig_to=<yanto@insera.co.id>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=12
    , delays=0.67/0.01/0.02/11, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as B345C18C04BC)
    Jul 10 15:02:26 collosus postfix/smtp[15213]: 41C9818C01C4: to=<pakpos@inssby.co.id>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=12, delays=0.67/0.01/0.02/11, d
    sn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as B345C18C04BC)
    Jul 10 15:02:26 collosus postfix/smtp[15213]: 41C9818C01C4: to=<sofi@inssby.co.id>, orig_to=<yanto@insera.co.id>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=12,
    delays=0.67/0.01/0.02/11, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as B345C18C04BC)
    Jul 10 15:02:26 collosus postfix/smtp[15213]: 41C9818C01C4: to=<subagio.to@inssby.co.id>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=12, delays=0.67/0.01/0.02/1
    1, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as B345C18C04BC)
    Jul 10 15:02:26 collosus postfix/smtp[15213]: 41C9818C01C4: to=<subagio@inssby.co.id>, orig_to=<subagio@insera.co.id>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, dela
    y=12, delays=0.67/0.01/0.02/11, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as B345C18C04BC)
    Jul 10 15:02:26 collosus postfix/smtp[15213]: 41C9818C01C4: to=<yanto@inssby.co.id>, orig_to=<yanto@insera.co.id>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=12
    , delays=0.67/0.01/0.02/11, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as B345C18C04BC)
    Jul 10 15:02:26 collosus postfix/qmgr[4738]: 41C9818C01C4: removed

    Jul 10 15:02:27 collosus postfix/lmtp[14342]: B345C18C04BC: to=<anton@inssby.co.id>, relay=collosus.insera-sena.com[192.168.1.16]:7025, delay=0.42, delays=0.
    04/0.02/0.01/0.36, dsn=2.1.5, status=sent (250 2.1.5 OK)
    Jul 10 15:02:27 collosus postfix/lmtp[14342]: B345C18C04BC: to=<pakpos@inssby.co.id>, relay=collosus.insera-sena.com[192.168.1.16]:7025, delay=0.42, delays=0
    .04/0.02/0.01/0.36, dsn=2.1.5, status=sent (250 2.1.5 OK)
    Jul 10 15:02:27 collosus postfix/lmtp[14342]: B345C18C04BC: to=<sofi@inssby.co.id>, relay=collosus.insera-sena.com[192.168.1.16]:7025, delay=0.42, delays=0.0
    4/0.02/0.01/0.36, dsn=2.1.5, status=sent (250 2.1.5 OK)
    Jul 10 15:02:27 collosus postfix/lmtp[14342]: B345C18C04BC: to=<subagio.to@inssby.co.id>, relay=collosus.insera-sena.com[192.168.1.16]:7025, delay=0.42, dela
    ys=0.04/0.02/0.01/0.36, dsn=2.1.5, status=sent (250 2.1.5 OK)
    Jul 10 15:02:27 collosus postfix/lmtp[14342]: B345C18C04BC: to=<subagio@inssby.co.id>, relay=collosus.insera-sena.com[192.168.1.16]:7025, delay=0.42, delays=
    0.04/0.02/0.01/0.36, dsn=2.1.5, status=sent (250 2.1.5 OK)
    Jul 10 15:02:27 collosus postfix/lmtp[14342]: B345C18C04BC: to=<yanto@inssby.co.id>, relay=collosus.insera-sena.com[192.168.1.16]:7025, delay=0.43, delays=0.
    04/0.02/0.01/0.36, dsn=2.1.5, status=sent (250 2.1.5 OK)
    Jul 10 15:02:27 collosus postfix/qmgr[4738]: B345C18C04BC: removed
    ---------------------------------------------------------------

    Fyi, subagio.to@inssby.co.id and subagio@inssby.co.id didn't get the email on his inbox.

    Filter on subagio@inssby.co.id:
    -------------------------------------------------
    If any of the following conditions are met:
    Cc contains "subagio@inssby.co.id"
    Cc contains "subagio@insera.co.id"
    To contains "subagio@inssby.co.id"
    To contains "subagio@insera.co.id"
    Perform the following actions:
    Forward to address "subagio.to@inssby.co.id"
    Stop (do not process additional filters)
    -------------------------------------------------

    Do I need to re-indexing the mailbox?
    What is the function of re-indexing the mailbox?

    Thanks,
    Donny Christiaan.

  4. #4
    uxbod's Avatar
    uxbod is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    8,017
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    The original email is already going to <subagio.to@inssby.co.id> so why has that filter been created ? I presume the domain inssby.co.id is hosted on your ZCS server aswell ? If so, then why not just add it as a alias to the users account instead of setting up that filter.

  5. #5
    dchristiaan is offline Intermediate Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    23
    Rep Power
    6

    Default

    Ok, lets me explain it to you.

    Correct, @inssby.co.id is hosted on our ZCS

    subagio.to@inssby.co.id receive this email because we have set on sender_bcc_maps every outgoing mail from mis@insera.co.id will be send to subagio.to@inssby.co.id (our manager)

    the filters need to be created because he only want every email that send To: or Cc: subagio@inssby.co.id to be receive on subagio.to@inssby.co.id

    evey email that he receive from distribution list which he part of the list automatically go to subagio@inssby.co.id instead of subagio.to@inssby.co.id

    thats why he need to create the filter.

    My friend said that this problem came after I patch the zimbra, is it correct?
    Also some of my user said the mail server getting slower after I patched it.

    Thanks for your help ... I also have problem on duplicate mail that i've alread posted on How to eliminate Duplicate Emails maybe you have some way out for my problem.

    Best Regards,
    Donny Christiaan.

  6. #6
    uxbod's Avatar
    uxbod is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    8,017
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    I would advice you to upgrade to 5.0.18 for a start.

  7. #7
    dchristiaan is offline Intermediate Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    23
    Rep Power
    6

    Default

    Dear uxbod,

    Ok then, I'll plan to upgrade to 5.0.18
    Thanks for your support.

    Best Regards,
    Donny Christiaan.

  8. #8
    dchristiaan is offline Intermediate Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    23
    Rep Power
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by uxbod View Post
    I would advice you to upgrade to 5.0.18 for a start.
    Hi uxbod,

    Before I do the upgrade to 5.0.18 can u give me more explaination why do I must upgrade from 5.0.10 to 5.0.18?

    Will it solve my problem after I upgrade to 5.0.18?

    Thanks,
    Donny Christiaan.

  9. #9
    uxbod's Avatar
    uxbod is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    8,017
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Well you will get all the fixes and enhancements for a start. Did you apply the security fix aswell ?

  10. #10
    dchristiaan is offline Intermediate Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    23
    Rep Power
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by uxbod View Post
    Well you will get all the fixes and enhancements for a start. Did you apply the security fix aswell ?
    Hi,

    Yes, I already applied the Security Fix (Critical Security Issue)

    I'm planning to try the upgrade for the start, I'll inform you soon after the upgrade.

    Thanks,
    Donny Christiaan.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. smtp auth failing 'auth_zimbra: not initialized'
    By kkg039 in forum Administrators
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-05-2013, 11:10 AM
  2. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-03-2011, 07:01 AM
  3. getting duplicate copy of old emails every day
    By chandu in forum Administrators
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-12-2009, 12:16 AM
  4. [SOLVED] Install Problem in Ubuntu 6.06 Server
    By xtimox in forum Installation
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 03-27-2008, 09:36 AM
  5. Fedora Core 3, Clean Install - Not working!
    By pcjackson in forum Installation
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 03-05-2006, 07:38 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •