Zimbra offers Open Source email server software and shared calendar for Linux and the Mac
Go Back   Zimbra :: Forums > Zimbra Collaboration Suite > Administrators
Reload this Page Mail not going to user mailbox instead of status=sent on maillog

Welcome to the Zimbra :: Forums!
Welcome, if you would like to post a comment please register. We also encourage you to explore all things Zimbra with our team and members of the community.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2009, 02:20 AM
Intermediate Member
  
Posts: 23
Default Mail not going to user mailbox instead of status=sent on maillog
Dear Expert,

I have problem with my Zimbra.

My /var/log/maillog said the mail was sent to our user but my user didnt' get it on his inbox.

Jul 10 15:02:27 collosus postfix/lmtp[14342]: B345C18C04BC: to=<subagio@inssby.co.id>,relay=coll.xxx.com[192.168.1.16]:7025, delay=0.42, delays=0.04/0.02/0.01/0.36, dsn=2.1.5, status=sent (250 2.1.5 OK)

User subagio@inssby.co.id didn't get the mail.

My Zimbra version:
Release 5.0.10_GA_2638.RHEL5_20081003052615 CentOS5 FOSS edition

OS: CentOS release 5.2 (Final)

I also have implement this patch Critical Security Issue

Please your help for me to solve this problem.

Thanks,
Donny Christiaan.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2009, 02:27 AM
Moderator
  
Posts: 7,928
Default
Can you post the full entries from /var/log/zimbra.log for that email please. Does the user have any filters in place ? Have you tried re-indexing their mailbox aswell ?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2009, 02:44 AM
Intermediate Member
  
Posts: 23
Default
Hi uxbod,

Thanks for your prompt reply.

Here is my /var/log/zimbra.log
---------------------------------------------------------------
Jul 10 15:02:26 collosus postfix/smtpd[14340]: B345C18C04BC: client=localhost.localdomain[127.0.0.1]
Jul 10 15:02:26 collosus postfix/cleanup[14329]: B345C18C04BC: message-id=<4A56F57F.60303@insera.co.id>
Jul 10 15:02:26 collosus postfix/smtpd[14340]: disconnect from localhost.localdomain[127.0.0.1]
Jul 10 15:02:26 collosus postfix/qmgr[4738]: B345C18C04BC: from=<mis@insera.co.id>, size=26773, nrcpt=6 (queue active)
Jul 10 15:02:26 collosus amavis[12756]: (12756-01) FWD via SMTP: <mis@insera.co.id> -> <anton@inssby.co.id>,<pakpos@inssby.co.id>,<sofi@i nssby.co.id>,<subagi
o.to@inssby.co.id>,<subagio@inssby.c...i nssby.co.id>,BODY=8BITMIME 250 2.6.0 Ok, id=12756-01, from MTA([127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as
B345C18C04BC
Jul 10 15:02:26 collosus amavis[12756]: (12756-01) Passed CLEAN, LOCAL [192.168.1.37] [192.168.1.37] <mis@insera.co.id> -> <anton@inssby.co.id>,<pakpos@inssb
y.co.id>,<sofi@inssby.co.id>,<subagio.to@inssby.co .id>,<subagio@inssby.co.id>,<yanto@inssby.co.id>, Message-ID: <4A56F57F.60303@insera.co.id>, mail_id: vxd3D
jd9lliT, Hits: -3.608, size: 26138, queued_as: B345C18C04BC, 10851 ms
Jul 10 15:02:26 collosus amavis[12756]: (12756-01) extra modules loaded: /opt/zimbra/zimbramon/lib/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Net/SSLeay/autosplit.ix, /opt
/zimbra/zimbramon/lib/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Net/SSLeay/randomize.al, IO/Socket/SSL.pm, Net/LDAP/Extension.pm, Net/SSLeay.pm
Jul 10 15:02:26 collosus postfix/smtp[15213]: 41C9818C01C4: to=<anton@inssby.co.id>, orig_to=<yanto@insera.co.id>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=12
, delays=0.67/0.01/0.02/11, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as B345C18C04BC)
Jul 10 15:02:26 collosus postfix/smtp[15213]: 41C9818C01C4: to=<pakpos@inssby.co.id>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=12, delays=0.67/0.01/0.02/11, d
sn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as B345C18C04BC)
Jul 10 15:02:26 collosus postfix/smtp[15213]: 41C9818C01C4: to=<sofi@inssby.co.id>, orig_to=<yanto@insera.co.id>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=12,
delays=0.67/0.01/0.02/11, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as B345C18C04BC)
Jul 10 15:02:26 collosus postfix/smtp[15213]: 41C9818C01C4: to=<subagio.to@inssby.co.id>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=12, delays=0.67/0.01/0.02/1
1, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as B345C18C04BC)
Jul 10 15:02:26 collosus postfix/smtp[15213]: 41C9818C01C4: to=<subagio@inssby.co.id>, orig_to=<subagio@insera.co.id>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, dela
y=12, delays=0.67/0.01/0.02/11, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as B345C18C04BC)
Jul 10 15:02:26 collosus postfix/smtp[15213]: 41C9818C01C4: to=<yanto@inssby.co.id>, orig_to=<yanto@insera.co.id>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=12
, delays=0.67/0.01/0.02/11, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as B345C18C04BC)
Jul 10 15:02:26 collosus postfix/qmgr[4738]: 41C9818C01C4: removed

Jul 10 15:02:27 collosus postfix/lmtp[14342]: B345C18C04BC: to=<anton@inssby.co.id>, relay=collosus.insera-sena.com[192.168.1.16]:7025, delay=0.42, delays=0.
04/0.02/0.01/0.36, dsn=2.1.5, status=sent (250 2.1.5 OK)
Jul 10 15:02:27 collosus postfix/lmtp[14342]: B345C18C04BC: to=<pakpos@inssby.co.id>, relay=collosus.insera-sena.com[192.168.1.16]:7025, delay=0.42, delays=0
.04/0.02/0.01/0.36, dsn=2.1.5, status=sent (250 2.1.5 OK)
Jul 10 15:02:27 collosus postfix/lmtp[14342]: B345C18C04BC: to=<sofi@inssby.co.id>, relay=collosus.insera-sena.com[192.168.1.16]:7025, delay=0.42, delays=0.0
4/0.02/0.01/0.36, dsn=2.1.5, status=sent (250 2.1.5 OK)
Jul 10 15:02:27 collosus postfix/lmtp[14342]: B345C18C04BC: to=<subagio.to@inssby.co.id>, relay=collosus.insera-sena.com[192.168.1.16]:7025, delay=0.42, dela
ys=0.04/0.02/0.01/0.36, dsn=2.1.5, status=sent (250 2.1.5 OK)
Jul 10 15:02:27 collosus postfix/lmtp[14342]: B345C18C04BC: to=<subagio@inssby.co.id>, relay=collosus.insera-sena.com[192.168.1.16]:7025, delay=0.42, delays=
0.04/0.02/0.01/0.36, dsn=2.1.5, status=sent (250 2.1.5 OK)
Jul 10 15:02:27 collosus postfix/lmtp[14342]: B345C18C04BC: to=<yanto@inssby.co.id>, relay=collosus.insera-sena.com[192.168.1.16]:7025, delay=0.43, delays=0.
04/0.02/0.01/0.36, dsn=2.1.5, status=sent (250 2.1.5 OK)
Jul 10 15:02:27 collosus postfix/qmgr[4738]: B345C18C04BC: removed
---------------------------------------------------------------

Fyi, subagio.to@inssby.co.id and subagio@inssby.co.id didn't get the email on his inbox.

Filter on subagio@inssby.co.id:
-------------------------------------------------
If any of the following conditions are met:
Cc contains "subagio@inssby.co.id"
Cc contains "subagio@insera.co.id"
To contains "subagio@inssby.co.id"
To contains "subagio@insera.co.id"
Perform the following actions:
Forward to address "subagio.to@inssby.co.id"
Stop (do not process additional filters)
-------------------------------------------------

Do I need to re-indexing the mailbox?
What is the function of re-indexing the mailbox?

Thanks,
Donny Christiaan.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2009, 02:55 AM
Moderator
  
Posts: 7,928
Default
The original email is already going to <subagio.to@inssby.co.id> so why has that filter been created ? I presume the domain inssby.co.id is hosted on your ZCS server aswell ? If so, then why not just add it as a alias to the users account instead of setting up that filter.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2009, 03:07 AM
Intermediate Member
  
Posts: 23
Default
Ok, lets me explain it to you.

Correct, @inssby.co.id is hosted on our ZCS

subagio.to@inssby.co.id receive this email because we have set on sender_bcc_maps every outgoing mail from mis@insera.co.id will be send to subagio.to@inssby.co.id (our manager)

the filters need to be created because he only want every email that send To: or Cc: subagio@inssby.co.id to be receive on subagio.to@inssby.co.id

evey email that he receive from distribution list which he part of the list automatically go to subagio@inssby.co.id instead of subagio.to@inssby.co.id

thats why he need to create the filter.

My friend said that this problem came after I patch the zimbra, is it correct?
Also some of my user said the mail server getting slower after I patched it.

Thanks for your help ... I also have problem on duplicate mail that i've alread posted on How to eliminate Duplicate Emails maybe you have some way out for my problem.

Best Regards,
Donny Christiaan.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2009, 03:12 AM
Moderator
  
Posts: 7,928
Default
I would advice you to upgrade to 5.0.18 for a start.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2009, 03:13 AM
Intermediate Member
  
Posts: 23
Default
Dear uxbod,

Ok then, I'll plan to upgrade to 5.0.18
Thanks for your support.

Best Regards,
Donny Christiaan.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2009, 07:01 PM
Intermediate Member
  
Posts: 23
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by uxbod View Post
I would advice you to upgrade to 5.0.18 for a start.
Hi uxbod,

Before I do the upgrade to 5.0.18 can u give me more explaination why do I must upgrade from 5.0.10 to 5.0.18?

Will it solve my problem after I upgrade to 5.0.18?

Thanks,
Donny Christiaan.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07-11-2009, 02:03 AM
Moderator
  
Posts: 7,928
Default
Well you will get all the fixes and enhancements for a start. Did you apply the security fix aswell ?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2009, 02:38 AM
Intermediate Member
  
Posts: 23
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by uxbod View Post
Well you will get all the fixes and enhancements for a start. Did you apply the security fix aswell ?
Hi,

Yes, I already applied the Security Fix (Critical Security Issue)

I'm planning to try the upgrade for the start, I'll inform you soon after the upgrade.

Thanks,
Donny Christiaan.
Reply With Quote
Reply

« Previous Thread | Today's Posts or Week's Posts | Next Thread »

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode


Similar Threads

Product Information

Why Join?

Registering let's you ask questions, makes it easier to search, displays any files attached to posts, and notifies you about replies.

blog.zimbra.com


Home - Blog - Contact Us - Archive - Top


 

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.