Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Missing X-Spam Flags in Message Headers!

  1. #1
    no1youknowz Guest

    Default Missing X-Spam Flags in Message Headers!

    Hi All,

    My problem is similar to the post outlined here: https://www.zimbra.com/forums/admini...n-missing.html

    New user to Zimbra, but not linux

    Installation was a breeze, got it all up and running in no time. However when it came to configuring the spamassassin rules to my own preferences, this is where I started getting problems.

    Before I did any modifications to /opt/zimbra/conf/salocal.cf my X-Spam Flags were fine:

    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.23 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=-0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, TVD_SPACE_RATIO=2.219]
    X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at foo.com
    Recieved: from zimbra.foo.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.foo.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vKkBvkKlT3N1 for <test3@foo.com>; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:48:06 +0100 (BST)
    Received: from zimbra.foo.com (zimbra.foo.com [192.168.1.37]) by zimbra.foo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B157057C213 for <test3@foo.com>; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:48:06 +0100 (BST)
    X-Spam-Flag: NO
    X-Spam-Score: -2.23
    X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.26]

    Now when I change the salocal.cf and then REVERT it back to the original file and restore the permissions and restart Zimbra I only get.

    X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at foo.com
    Recieved: from zimbra.foo.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.foo.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vKkBvkKlT3N1 for <test3@foo.com>; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:48:06 +0100 (BST)
    Received: from zimbra.foo.com (zimbra.foo.com [192.168.1.37]) by zimbra.foo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B157057C213 for <test3@foo.com>; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:48:06 +0100 (BST)

    What the weird problem is, that if I restart Zimbra or amavisd services (several times I might add), it will revert back to the original X-Spam info, but after the 2nd or 3rd email... it goes back to no information.

    EDIT:

    Forgot to mention, I have run SpamAssassin in debug mode and looking at the results, I get this..

    Apr 23 15:24:29 zimbra.foo.com /opt/zimbra/amavisd/sbin/amavisd[25989]: (25989-01) header: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at foo.com\n
    Apr 23 15:24:29 zimbra.foo.com /opt/zimbra/amavisd/sbin/amavisd[25989]: (25989-01) header: X-Spam-Flag: YES\n
    Apr 23 15:24:29 zimbra.foo.com /opt/zimbra/amavisd/sbin/amavisd[25989]: (25989-01) header: X-Spam-Score: 6.784\n
    Apr 23 15:24:29 zimbra.foo.com /opt/zimbra/amavisd/sbin/amavisd[25989]: (25989-01) header: X-Spam-Level: ******\n
    Apr 23 15:24:29 zimbra.foo.com /opt/zimbra/amavisd/sbin/amavisd[25989]: (25989-01) header: X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=6.784
    tagged_above=-10 required=6.6\n\ttests=[AWL=-4.516, BAYES_95=3, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, URIBL_BLACK=1.955,\n\tURIBL_JP_SURBL=1.501, URIBL_OB_SURBL=1.5, URIBL_PH_SURBL=1.787,\n\tURIBL_RED=0.001, URIBL_RHS_DOB=1.083, URIBL_SC_SURBL=0.474]\n
    Apr 23 15:24:29 zimbra.foo.com /opt/zimbra/amavisd/sbin/amavisd[25989]: (25989-01) header: Received: from zimbra.foo.com ([127.0.0.1])\n\tby localhost (zimbra.foo.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\n\twith ESMTP id BQCBXx1EZrPk for <admin@foo.com>;\n\tThu, 23 Apr 2009 15:24:27 +0100 (BST)\n
    Apr 23 15:24:29 zimbra.foo.com /opt/zimbra/amavisd/sbin/amavisd[25989]: (25989-01) headers CLUSTERING: done all 1 recips in one go
    Apr 23 15:24:29 zimbra.foo.com /opt/zimbra/amavisd/sbin/amavisd[25989]: (25989-01) SPAM-TAG, <zimbra@zimbra.foo.com> -> <admin@foo.com>, Yes, score=6.784 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 tests=[AWL=-4.516, BAYES_95=3, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, URIBL_BLACK=1.955, URIBL_JP_SURBL=1.501, URIBL_OB_SURBL=1.5, URIBL_PH_SURBL=1.787, URIBL_RED=0.001, URIBL_RHS_DOB=1.083, URIBL_SC_SURBL=0.474]

    But STILL the email has no X-SPAM headers! I cant figure this out!

    I really need to see the X-Spam info consistently in every email. Can anyone help me troubleshoot this?

    Can you also tell me which is the correct local file to put my own SpamAssassin rules?

    /opt/zimbra/conf/salocal.cf
    /opt/zimbra/conf/spamassassin/local.cf

    I am running:

    OS: CentOS 5.2
    Installation File: zcs-5.0.11_GA_2695.RHEL5.20081117051306.tgz
    If I do : /opt/zimbra/bin/zmprov getServer zimbra.foo.com | grep zimbraMtaMyNetworks
    Result: zimbraMtaMyNetworks: 127.0.0.0/8

    Any questions I'll be happy to answer. I just want this fixed!

    Thanks
    Last edited by no1youknowz; 04-27-2009 at 02:54 AM.

  2. #2
    phoenix is online now Zimbra Consultant & Moderator
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Vannes, France
    Posts
    23,566
    Rep Power
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by no1youknowz View Post
    If I do : /opt/zimbra/bin/zmprov getServer zimbra.foo.com | grep zimbraMtaMyNetworks
    Result: zimbraMtaMyNetworks: 127.0.0.0/8
    That's incorrect, you need the following settings: ZimbraMtaMyNetworks - Zimbra :: Wiki
    Regards


    Bill


    Acompli: A new adventure for Co-Founder KevinH.

  3. #3
    no1youknowz Guest

    Default

    Thanks for replying, but I already tried this and it doesnt make any change...

    mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 192.168.1.0/24

    zmprov getServer zimbra.foo.com | grep zimbraMtaMyNetworks
    zimbraMtaMyNetworks: 127.0.0.0/8 192.168.1.0/24
    Can anyone please help?

  4. #4
    uxbod's Avatar
    uxbod is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    8,017
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Would you please post the full headers from a email.

  5. #5
    no1youknowz Guest

    Default

    From 1 local account to zimbra to another. The client is Thunderbird.


  6. #6
    no1youknowz Guest

    Default

    Anyone have any ideas?

    I may probably nuke the box and start again, even though its a test one for now.

    What I dont want to be, is back at this point when I start modifying the salocal.cf, local.cf rules.

    Thanks

  7. #7
    uxbod's Avatar
    uxbod is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    8,017
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Instead of re-installing why not try just upgrading to 5.0.15 ?

  8. #8
    no1youknowz Guest

    Default

    Would a small incremental upgrade from 5.0.11 to 5.0.15 really make that much of a difference??

  9. #9
    uxbod's Avatar
    uxbod is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    8,017
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    It can do ...

  10. #10
    no1youknowz Guest

    Default

    I will be upgrading sometime today, does anyone know a fix if it doesnt work?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 'Couldn't access Yahoo! Zimbra Desktop server"
    By chirag1 in forum Error Reports
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 06-12-2011, 05:14 PM
  2. [SOLVED] Zimbra desktop slowed down the system
    By hvle in forum General Questions
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-23-2009, 05:32 PM
  3. Emails bouncing with "Error Text: 401,'null'"
    By sholden in forum Zimbra Connector for Outlook
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 08-20-2008, 04:59 PM
  4. migrate20070809-Signatures.pl?
    By j.mc in forum Installation
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-11-2008, 09:52 AM
  5. Traslation SVN tree status
    By meikka in forum I18N/L10N - Translations
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-13-2007, 11:13 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •