Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: 5.0.13 is much slower

  1. #1
    dagar is offline Special Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    middle of a corn field, IL
    Posts
    111
    Rep Power
    9

    Default 5.0.13 is much slower

    I am hoping that someone else has noticed this issue and can also help with a workaround. Going from 5.0.11 to 5.0.13 NE has really slowed things down. The users are all complaining about a real lag in opening/deleting emails. They are using the web client with FF2 (since they are on windoze 2000 Terminal Server, FF3 does not work as well and the colors wash out, hopefully will be able to finish the windoze 2003 upgrade soon)
    Anyway, on the zimbra server itself, the zmlogprocess and the mysqld are consuming much more cpu then they were with 5.0.11
    This is on rhel4 64bit. Anyone else have similar issues or workarounds
    Thanks
    Derek

  2. #2
    uxbod's Avatar
    uxbod is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    8,017
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Please update your profile if you have upgraded So, how do you perceive memory/cpu usage has increased ? I don't think step releases have changed things that much. So has your user base changed much? More web clients? Perhaps if you post some pre/post usage statistics would help. Thanks.

  3. #3
    bdial's Avatar
    bdial is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    1,649
    Rep Power
    11

    Default

    try turning off logger for a bit too see if it speeds up then you know where the problem is.

  4. #4
    dagar is offline Special Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    middle of a corn field, IL
    Posts
    111
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    I will update my profile.
    I think that the performance issues may be with the logger or mysql. I have 62 users and before last night my load average would rarely go above 1 whereas right now it was over 2.

    UPDATE:
    I just did a zmloggerctl restart and that took my load average to 1.25 and users are saying that responsiveness is about the same as it was before. I am wondering if there was an issue with the upgrade to cause that.

  5. #5
    dagar is offline Special Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    middle of a corn field, IL
    Posts
    111
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Turning off the logger takes the load average down to 0.35
    thanks

  6. #6
    Bill Brock is offline Outstanding Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    703
    Rep Power
    9

    Default Is there a logger issue in 13.

    Or is this an isolated case.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 5.0.13 safe to use/upgrade?
    By dijichi2 in forum Installation
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-12-2009, 02:20 PM
  2. 5.0.13 Released/5.0.12 Bug
    By mmorse in forum Announcements
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-10-2009, 01:23 AM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-21-2006, 05:25 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •