I had the same thought myself, so then I figured I would try a few others, one after another, testing if the message content was at fault. If I tried small, large, attachment or no, there was always this delay of a few seconds after I thought 'boy this should be up by now.'
I did notice some correlation to server load, but response was never what I felt was 'fast' even when the server doesn't show load. This box isn't exactly underprovisioned, dual opteron with 6GB memory and 10K or 15K SAS drives, so I don't see how it would have this bad of performance. My only guess is that something in the zimbra server is just slow.
4.5.x was snappy but 5.0.1 is a bit disappointing in the performance category. If there's something I can tune I'll be more than willing to try. |