Quote:
Originally Posted by lstroud  This may be a dumb question, but why is the html editor in the standard version so much more complete/nicer than the one in the advanced version?
I don't mean to be insulting, but it seems like the advanced version is less complete and less polished. Is it new? Don't get me wrong advanced is better in nearly every other way. |
We've only recently inserted a WYSWYG editor into the lite/standard (HTML) web-client:
/blog/archives/2007/11/50_coolness_part_2.html
Infact it's the YUI editor:
Yahoo! UI Library: Rich Text Editor
We will continue to expand the advanced (AJAX) web-client editor - in 5.0.6 for example we've added better link editing:
Quote:
Originally Posted by lstroud The only feature that standard seems to be missing is inlining images that you attach (and are not available on a web server). Advanced does this, but unintuitively (via attachments, not an image button) and it seems a bit fragile.
LES |
Vote for / support ticket tag / cc watch this RFE:
Bug 21963 - HTML Client: Inline image attachment feature in "add attachment" page