Thread: bayes db..
View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2008, 07:12 AM
osiris osiris is offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 59
Default

Quick update on this issue, after running "/opt/zimbra/bin/zmtrainsa" the database seems to fix it self, tried then to run the latest spam from SPAM Archive , same thing happend again, bayes db version is 0 cant continue.. running "/opt/zimbra/bin/zmtrainsa" fixes the problems once again and seems like the data is recorded, first paste after 1st run with 2008/01 from SPAM Archive , then run "/opt/zimbra/bin/zmtrainsa" to correct the db and 2nd paste is after running trough 2008/02 from SPAM Archive and running "/opt/zimbra/bin/zmtrainsa" after.. So things seems to work, with a little back and forth...

[zimbra@smtp09 ~]$ sa-learn --dump magic --dbpath /opt/zimbra/amavisd/.spamassassin/
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 48569 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 182 0 non-token data: nham
0.000 0 320884 0 non-token data: ntokens
0.000 0 1201182731 0 non-token data: oldest atime
0.000 0 1202568385 0 non-token data: newest atime
0.000 0 1202568246 0 non-token data: last journal sync atime
0.000 0 1202567874 0 non-token data: last expiry atime
0.000 0 1382400 0 non-token data: last expire atime delta
0.000 0 619588 0 non-token data: last expire reduction count
[zimbra@smtp09 ~]$


[zimbra@smtp09 02]$ sa-learn --dump magic --dbpath /opt/zimbra/amavisd/.spamassassin/
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 63780 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 182 0 non-token data: nham
0.000 0 574841 0 non-token data: ntokens
0.000 0 1201182731 0 non-token data: oldest atime
0.000 0 1202569223 0 non-token data: newest atime
0.000 0 1202569577 0 non-token data: last journal sync atime
0.000 0 1202567874 0 non-token data: last expiry atime
0.000 0 1382400 0 non-token data: last expire atime delta
0.000 0 619588 0 non-token data: last expire reduction count
[zimbra@smtp09 02]$



So my question shifted from previous post to, why is this happening, can I fix this, as I take its not supposed to be like this?

Question 1) and 2) from previous post remains (a mystery?)..
Reply With Quote