Quote:
Originally Posted by padraig  did a quick & dirty script to do this could be cron'ed: |
Your mileage may vary, but in my experience so far, I have very little need to train anything more as ham. My problem is false negatives, not false positives. The very LAST thing I want is for any automated process, because it's not quite right, to over-train my system with bad stuff that is mistakenly recognized as ham. So unless you're having a lot of false-positive problems (that can't be addressed more effectively with a little score-tweaking) I would stay away from automated ham analysis altogether.