Quote:
Originally Posted by dwmtractor So, Mike, are you saying that brained is right and perusing the list to decide what needs purging is not an option? |
If you know you have a lot wrong just dump it.
Or lookup check_whitelist - It's like ./check_whitelist | grep
user@domain.com Quote:
Originally Posted by dwmtractor And how much averaging does it take? the message is already getting a maximum Bayes score but is getting about half of that score robbed back by the AWL. |
It's the average between the currentMessageScore & the currentHistoryAverage.
(For the stats buffs that's x-bar of the x-bar-bar right? average of a sample of a grand sample? Sometimes it makes me wish I paid more attention back in the day...)
For example: If someone with a currentHistoryAverage of 1 sent me an email that had some bad items in it, and it got a currentMessageScore of 9 before AWL is applied:
The AWL system would get the resulting average as 5 (1+9=10 10/2=5) so the AWL would knock 4 points off the score in this case. And the final score is 5.
(I believe there's also a setting for how much force/weighting to give it, ie: You could choose half of that 4 so it would only bring it down 2 points for a final score of 7.)
A quicker description for what your having happen: Some spam that you got everyday with a past average of 10, and today gets a current score of 20 before AWL is applied, can result in the AWL
knocking 5 points off the score, resulting in a final score of 15.
Quote:
The algorithm works using a database of entries. Each entry has a key formed by the From: address of the mail, and the IP address it originated at, and contains a TOTAL score and a COUNT number. The MEAN score is TOTAL/COUNT.
The current algorithm works as follows:
1. Compute the SCORE of the message without AWL
2. Compute AWL DELTA as (MEAN-SCORE)*auto_whitelist_factor
3. Increment TOTAL by SCORE
4. Increment COUNT by one
5. Set the final score of the message to SCORE+DELTA
|
That finalScore isn't put back into the database of prior history for SA scores so your not slowly skewing it towards one value and fixing it there!
Quote:
Originally Posted by dwmtractor Any clue how many times I have to re-define a message as junk before AWL is neutralized? |
Sound's like a fun math problem to me...
