View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-05-2007, 06:24 PM
Dirk Dirk is offline
Moderator
 
Posts: 927
Default

Yeah.... the server sucks, it's high on my list of 'must replace' but currently its running in a VM on a Proliant server with two Xeon 900MHz chips and a whopping 1gb ram, of which around 650mb is available to the zimbra install. Yes, I know this is below spec but it worked ok on beta 3 (admittedly with the AV turned off for good measure).

I'll be replacing it with something sane really soon.

free -m shows:

Code:
             total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:           627        585         42          0         15        358
-/+ buffers/cache:        210        416
Swap:          690          0        690
The os is debian etch updated as much as possible via aptitude upgrade, the native drives are raid 5 ultra scsi3's but as it's in a VM I doubt that's seen by the os.

Disk space is as follows

Code:
root@zimbra~ # df -h
Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1              15G  7.1G  6.4G  53% /
tmpfs                 314M     0  314M   0% /lib/init/rw
udev                   10M   52K   10M   1% /dev
tmpfs                 314M     0  314M   0% /dev/shm
Thanks for your help, it may well be a result of the server being under spec, and if that's the case then I'll increase the priority of replacing it, but perhaps a better error could be reported saying something like "Are you crazy, you cant run Zimbra on this!"

Last edited by Dirk; 10-05-2007 at 06:26 PM..
Reply With Quote