View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2006, 07:24 PM
stevekstevek stevekstevek is offline
Junior Member
 
Posts: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinH
Thanks for the note Steve. I'd encourage you to try our iSync beta and see where you still think CalDav is superior. Like I've said a few times from the clients we've looked at and the support in the industry CalDav is still in the early stages. Mac's support for iSync is a bit richer at the moment. We understand the benefits of CalDav long term and when a larger number of clients get deployed we'll be working on Zimbra CalDav support. As always thanks for the feedback!

I think that the main reason that caldav is better, is because the synchronization is done in _real time_. That is, as soon as I drag out a new appointment in iCal, it gets sent right up through CalDav to be shared. (I've been playing with the cosmo caldav server from OSAF).

With iSync, I need to manually run iSync all the time..
Reply With Quote