Thread: Image SPAM
View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 05-01-2009, 11:37 AM
ewilen ewilen is offline
Moderator
 
Posts: 1,405
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tgx View Post
If there is a weakness with ASSP it's retrieving snagged emails, but then again it's a problem with SA and Zimbra as well.
With SA/Zimbra, spam just goes into the Junk folder and retrieval is trivial. True, by default the most egregious spam gets deleted directly, but you can turn that off if you want. And really, the stuff with that high a score is extremely unlikely to be wanted.

That said, working off the idea I posted upthread, I wonder if you could do the following:
  • Turn off SA in Zimbra, but leave the spam/ham addresses intact
  • Have ASSP check those addresses
  • Have ASSP insert a header field that Zimbra can recognize (e.g. via Filters) and put the spam into Junk

Then, if the Junk/Not Junk button is still functional in ZWC, and if the system still forwards mail to the spam/ham addresses when it's moved into/out of
the Junk folder, you now have an easy reporting interface to ASSP along with easy retrieval of marked mail.

(Note: there's an RFE, by me, to have mail forwarded to spam if it's Filtered into Junk. That would break this model if Filters are used to recognize the ASSP junk-marking.)
__________________
Elliot Wilen
Berkeley, CA

Don't forget to enter your Zimbra version in your forum profile.
Reply With Quote